From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Ekaitz Zarraga <ekaitz@elenq.tech>, Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules?
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 13:19:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <753ba5897ed397b5e95175cd139137975245945b.camel@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <gv7A4Sc-mgUfzaQUN7rjf1Y3ir4JxgBJFBUZn_sIRL-b2iwKOYypjHpqtdIM_6u4R1PW69pWibO42PLnld4bWnwz77mPy5vCyfSiLj-SfGc=@elenq.tech>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1213 bytes --]
Ekaitz Zarraga schreef op zo 20-02-2022 om 11:34 [+0000]:
> Making a Guix pull is unpredictable too...
An idea for making "guix pull" faster:
1. Make package imports non-circular, breaking up package modules
in parts when necessary.
2. Instead of building all of Guix as a single derivation,
create a DAG of derivations. More concretely:
First read the *.scm files to determine which module imports
which modules. Then to compile, say, (gnu packages acl),
a derivation taking gnu/packages/acl.scm and its dependencies
gnu/packages/attr.go, gnu/packages/base.go, ... is made
compiling gnu/packages/acl.scm to a gnu/packages/acl.go.
Then to build all of Guix, 'union-build' or 'file-union' is used.
The benefit is that if, say, gnu/packages/gnunet.scm is changed, then
the old gnu/packages/acl.go will be reused because its derivation
doesn't depend on gnu/packages/gnunet.scm (*).
The need for non-circular imports can be avoided by computing the
strongly-connected components and compiling all the modules in a
component as a single unit.
Greetings,
Maxime.
(*) Actually I didn't verify if acl.scm depends on gnunet.scm or not.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-20 12:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-20 10:05 Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 10:48 ` Tobias Platen
2022-02-20 11:13 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-20 16:52 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 20:39 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-24 9:23 ` Hartmut Goebel
2022-02-24 11:18 ` Martin Becze
2022-02-25 0:27 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2022-02-25 12:41 ` Bengt Richter
2022-02-25 13:04 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2022-02-25 16:14 ` Bengt Richter
2022-02-25 16:32 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-25 16:49 ` Paul Jewell
2022-02-25 17:05 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-25 17:35 ` Taylan Kammer
2022-02-25 19:00 ` Leo Famulari
2022-04-04 8:00 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-04 9:43 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 10:15 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 12:49 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-04-04 10:16 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 10:37 ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-04 11:22 ` indieterminacy
2022-04-04 18:39 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-02-24 9:13 ` Hartmut Goebel
2022-02-24 9:36 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-02-20 11:08 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 11:27 ` Compiling blender Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 11:34 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 12:19 ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2022-02-20 16:47 ` Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules? Philip McGrath
2022-02-20 17:47 ` Semantics of circular imports Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:12 ` Philip McGrath
2022-03-27 14:19 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:24 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:33 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-27 14:55 ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-28 4:24 ` Zhu Zihao
2022-03-30 4:50 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-02-28 13:17 ` Faster "guix pull" by incremental compilation and non-circular modules? Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-28 18:50 ` Maxime Devos
2022-05-31 4:54 ` Gábor Boskovits
2022-05-31 8:49 ` Maxime Devos
2022-05-31 10:23 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 15:54 ` Compiling blender Ricardo Wurmus
2022-02-20 16:14 ` Ekaitz Zarraga
2022-02-20 12:20 ` Excessively energy-consuming software considered malware? Taylan Kammer
2022-02-20 12:37 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-20 12:44 ` Taylan Kammer
2022-02-20 14:59 ` Philip McGrath
2022-02-20 18:53 ` Christine Lemmer-Webber
2022-02-20 20:34 ` Jonathan McHugh
2022-02-20 12:32 ` Paul Jewell
2022-02-20 18:26 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-02-20 19:36 ` Ryan Sundberg
2022-02-21 9:29 ` Attila Lendvai
2022-02-21 13:06 ` Maxime Devos
2022-02-21 18:56 ` raingloom
2022-02-21 23:02 ` Attila Lendvai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=753ba5897ed397b5e95175cd139137975245945b.camel@telenet.be \
--to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
--cc=ekaitz@elenq.tech \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).