bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Hi!

As reported by laertus on irc[0]: guix pull on 0.13 without substitutes fails

      guix pull

    Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.3r6cH0
    From https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/snapshot/master.tar.gz...
     ….tar.gz                                   5.7MiB/s 00:02 | 13.6MiB transferred
    unpacking '/gnu/store/sginfwnrcfqn1far31gmzlaffd8xlxyy-guix-latest.tar.gz'...

    Starting download of /gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz
    From https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/archive/v0.25.1.tar.gz...
    following redirection to `https://codeload.github.com/libgit2/libgit2/tar.gz/v0.25.1'...
     v0.25.1                                     6.1MiB/s 00:01 | 4.1MiB transferred
    output path `/gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s', instead has `0ywcxw1mwd56c8qc14hbx31bf198gxck3nja3laxyglv7l57qp26'
    cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/z1ky970mnamnbairnpyxxb72qnc485zq-libgit2-0.25.1.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
    cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/rl7ms8rmbywvydy4qf656g1sdfxafb7r-guile-git-0.0-2.06f9fc3.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
    guix pull: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/rl7ms8rmbywvydy4qf656g1sdfxafb7r-guile-git-0.0-2.06f9fc3.drv' failed

because the libgit2-0.25.1 content hash does not check out.

I verified this on version-0.13.  The same goes for 0.26.0 on master

    $ guix build -S libgit2 --no-substitutes
    The following derivations will be built:
       /gnu/store/5szrmzmfgxk6pylk5fh9bk8apj4x8axf-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.xz.drv
       /gnu/store/mgh4yjxkxfyqmc7c61vwq4vs8v837602-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz.drv
    @ build-started /gnu/store/mgh4yjxkxfyqmc7c61vwq4vs8v837602-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/mg//h4yjxkxfyqmc7c61vwq4vs8v837602-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz.drv.bz2

    Starting download of /gnu/store/53lj4z9cavl7n27r89zjnvyd8fk854kj-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz
    From https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/archive/v0.26.0.tar.gz...
    following redirection to `https://codeload.github.com/libgit2/libgit2/tar.gz/v0.26.0'...
     v0.26.0  4.5MiB                    3.1MiB/s 00:01 [####################] 100.0%
    sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/53lj4z9cavl7n27r89zjnvyd8fk854kj-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz'
      expected: 1fdk9yhwvl1w1z71ykzcvgh4nsf8scxcbclz5anh98zpplmhmisa
      actual:   1b3figbhp5l83vd37vq6j2narrq4yl9pfw6mw0px0dzb1hz3jqka
    @ build-failed /gnu/store/mgh4yjxkxfyqmc7c61vwq4vs8v837602-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/53lj4z9cavl7n27r89zjnvyd8fk854kj-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.gz'
      expected: 1fdk9yhwvl1w1z71ykzcvgh4nsf8scxcbclz5anh98zpplmhmisa
      actual:   1b3figbhp5l83vd37vq6j2narrq4yl9pfw6mw0px0dzb1hz3jqka
    cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5szrmzmfgxk6pylk5fh9bk8apj4x8axf-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
    guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/5szrmzmfgxk6pylk5fh9bk8apj4x8axf-libgit2-0.26.0.tar.xz.drv' failed

I found no apparent difference in the content

    -r--r--r-- 1 janneke janneke  4252130 Oct  1 09:08 c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz
    -rw-r--r-- 1 janneke janneke  4252139 Oct  1 09:09 NEW-c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz
    -rw-r--r-- 1 janneke janneke 16363520 Oct  1 09:14 c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar
    -rw-r--r-- 1 janneke janneke 16363520 Oct  1 09:14 NEW-c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar

but there's this difference between the tar balls...

    12:13:57 janneke@dundal:~/src/guix-0.13 
    $ cmp -l c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar NEW-c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar
    13122049   0 157
    13122050   0 162
    13122051   0 151
    13122052   0 147
    13122053   0 151
    13122054   0 156
    13122055   0  57
    13122490  57   0
    13122491 157   0
    13122492 162   0
    13122493 151   0
    13122494 147   0
    13122495 151   0
    13122496 156   0
    13270529   0 157
    13270530   0 162
    13270531   0 151
    13270532   0 147
    13270533   0 151
    13270534   0 156
    13270535   0  57
    13270972  57   0
    13270973 157   0
    13270974 162   0
    13270975 151   0
    13270976 147   0
    13270977 151   0
    13270978 156   0
    13294081   0 157
    13294082   0 162
    13294083   0 151
    13294084   0 147
    13294085   0 151
    13294086   0 156
    13294087   0  57
    13294519  57   0
    13294520 157   0
    13294521 162   0
    13294522 151   0
    13294523 147   0
    13294524 151   0
    13294525 156   0

janneke

[0] https://gnunet.org/bot/log/guix/2017-10-01#T1517584

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:

The changing of the libgit-0.26.0 checksum was already reported about 3
weeks ago (github seems to only show relative dates)

    https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/4343

and the bug is still open.  It seems to be a github thing.  As I
understand it, currently our options are to update the hash and pray it
won't happen again or host libgit2 tarballs ourselves.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1294 bytes --]

On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:20:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> 
> The changing of the libgit-0.26.0 checksum was already reported about 3
> weeks ago (github seems to only show relative dates)
> 
>     https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/4343
> 
> and the bug is still open.  It seems to be a github thing.  As I
> understand it, currently our options are to update the hash and pray it
> won't happen again or host libgit2 tarballs ourselves.

I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:

1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
them, they are discussing this issue internally.
2) This is the relevant code change:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/commit/?id=22f0dcd9634a818a0c83f23ea1a48f2d620c0546

In the meantime, we can add this to the list of reasons that
reproducibility is difficult in the long term.

I don't have any solutions in mind besides keeping substitutes available
for as long as possible and, for users, using substitutes. We might also
petition upstream projects to offer a "real" release tarball.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[ng0]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1685 bytes --]

Leo Famulari transcribed 2.3K bytes:
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 09:20:42PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> > Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
> > 
> > The changing of the libgit-0.26.0 checksum was already reported about 3
> > weeks ago (github seems to only show relative dates)
> > 
> >     https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/issues/4343
> > 
> > and the bug is still open.  It seems to be a github thing.  As I
> > understand it, currently our options are to update the hash and pray it
> > won't happen again or host libgit2 tarballs ourselves.
> 
> I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:
> 
> 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
> generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
> would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
> them, they are discussing this issue internally.
> 2) This is the relevant code change:
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/git/git.git/commit/?id=22f0dcd9634a818a0c83f23ea1a48f2d620c0546
> 
> In the meantime, we can add this to the list of reasons that
> reproducibility is difficult in the long term.
> 
> I don't have any solutions in mind besides keeping substitutes available
> for as long as possible and, for users, using substitutes. We might also
> petition upstream projects to offer a "real" release tarball.

Given that we depend on this for our core functionality,
can't we just keep this on our ftp directory at gnu.org
as a fall-back source in a list?

-- 
ng0
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://krosos.org/dist/keys/
https://www.infotropique.org https://krosos.org

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi!

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:
>
> 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
> generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
> would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
> them, they are discussing this issue internally.

Oh?!  Then we’re in trouble.

Perhaps we should start using ‘git-fetch’ more, with Software Heritage
as a fallback content-addressed mirror?  Though again the difficulty is
that SWH uses Git’s method to hash directory contents, so we’d end up
having to provide both a Nix hash and a Git hash in ‘origin’.  :-/

> In the meantime, we can add this to the list of reasons that
> reproducibility is difficult in the long term.

Heh.

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1516 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:
> >
> > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
> > generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
> > would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
> > them, they are discussing this issue internally.
> 
> Oh?!  Then we’re in trouble.

I wonder, are there really that many affected packages? My sense is that
most GitHub-hosted projects offer their own release tarballs in addition
to the problematic auto-generated snapshots, and we tend to prefer the
upstream-provided tarballs in this case.

We'd need to survey our package sources to know what sort of reaction is
most appropriate.

In general, we should try to make Guix as resilient as possible to
unstable upstream sources, since the problem is not limited to GitHub.

> Perhaps we should start using ‘git-fetch’ more, with Software Heritage
> as a fallback content-addressed mirror?  Though again the difficulty is
> that SWH uses Git’s method to hash directory contents, so we’d end up
> having to provide both a Nix hash and a Git hash in ‘origin’.  :-/

And the Git hashes will change from SHA1 to SHA256 sooner or later, and
SHA1 hashes will become less reliable as CPUs get faster (collision
attacks), compounding the problem...

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Maxim Cournoyer]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Hi!
>> 
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>> 
>> > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:
>> >
>> > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
>> > generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
>> > would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
>> > them, they are discussing this issue internally.
>> 
>> Oh?!  Then we’re in trouble.
>
> I wonder, are there really that many affected packages?

There's a list here:
https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one
of the homebrew project's maintainers.

Maxim

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>> 
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>>> 
>>> > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said that:
>>> >
>>> > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
>>> > generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
>>> > would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying on
>>> > them, they are discussing this issue internally.
>>> 
>>> Oh?!  Then we’re in trouble.
>>
>> I wonder, are there really that many affected packages?
>
> There's a list here:
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one
> of the homebrew project's maintainers.

Interesting.  Thanks for the link!

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 570 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:47:06PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
> > I wonder, are there really that many affected packages?
> 
> There's a list here:
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one
> of the homebrew project's maintainers.

I meant, how many Guix packages use the auto-generated GitHub snapshots?

I believe the tell-tale sign is that the download link will have the
link text 'Source code', as for this release:

https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/releases/tag/v0.26.0

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Maxim Cournoyer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 640 bytes --]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:47:06PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>> > I wonder, are there really that many affected packages?
>> 
>> There's a list here:
>> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one
>> of the homebrew project's maintainers.
>
> I meant, how many Guix packages use the auto-generated GitHub snapshots?
>
> I believe the tell-tale sign is that the download link will have the
> link text 'Source code', as for this release:
>
> https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/releases/tag/v0.26.0

The following script:

[-- Attachment #2: find-affected-github-packages.scm --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1355 bytes --]

;;; A script to find packages possibly affected by GitHub
;;; infrastructure update that caused minor changes in the
;;; automatically generated tarballs.

(use-modules (ice-9 match)
	     (gnu packages)
	     (guix download)
	     (guix packages))

(define (problematic-uri? uri)

  (define (contains-github-archive? uri)
    (string-match "github.com/.*/archive/" uri))

  ;; URI can be a string or a list of string.
  (match uri
    ((uri1 uri2 ...)			;match list of strings
     (filter contains-github-archive? uri))
    (uri1				;match string
     (contains-github-archive? uri1))))

(define (problematic-github-package? package)
  (let ((source (package-source package)))
    (and (origin? source)
	 (eq? (origin-method source) url-fetch)
	 (problematic-uri? (origin-uri source)))))

(define (problematic-github-packages)
  "List of all the potentially problematic GitHub packages."
  (fold-packages (lambda (p r)
		   (if (problematic-github-package? p)
		       (cons p r)
		       r))
		 '()))
(define (main)
  "Find and print the names of the potentially problematic GitHub packages."
  (let ((packages (problematic-github-packages)))
    (format #t "Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages:~a~%"
	    (length packages))
    (for-each (lambda (p)
		(format #t "~a~%" (package-name p)))
	      packages)))

;;; Run the program.
(main)

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 771 bytes --]


outputs that there could be up to 1011 affected packages.

The scripts checks for a url-fetch uri of the form
"github.com/.*/archive/", which seems to be the one used for the
dynamically generated archives.

Here are the first 10 lines of the output:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages:1011
fdupes
cbatticon
sedsed
cpulimit
autojump
sudo
thermald
progress
dstat
[...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

I've checked the first few with for example:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix build --source --no-substitutes sedsed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and they were OK though.

Maxim

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 390 bytes --]

On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:22:34AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> Here are the first 10 lines of the output:
> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages:1011
> fdupes
> cbatticon
> sedsed
> cpulimit
> autojump
> sudo

I think the script is buggy; sudo's source is not downloaded from GitHub
as far as I can tell.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Maxim Cournoyer]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 632 bytes --]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:

> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 12:22:34AM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
>> Here are the first 10 lines of the output:
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages:1011
>> fdupes
>> cbatticon
>> sedsed
>> cpulimit
>> autojump
>> sudo
>
> I think the script is buggy; sudo's source is not downloaded from GitHub
> as far as I can tell.

Good catch! I was assuming empty lists were falsy, but that's not the
case! I've ensured purely boolean predicates now and it gets the list
down to 650.

Here's the corrected script:

[-- Attachment #2: find-problematic-github-packages.scm --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1386 bytes --]

;;; A script to find packages possibly affected by GitHub
;;; infrastructure update that caused minor changes in the
;;; automatically generated tarballs.

(use-modules (ice-9 match)
	     (gnu packages)
	     (guix download)
	     (guix packages))

(define (problematic-uri? uri)

  (define (contains-github-archive? uri)
    (regexp-match? (string-match "github.com/.*/archive/" uri)))

  ;; URI can be a string or a list of string.
  (match uri
    ((uri1 uri2 ...)			;match list of strings
     (not (null? (filter contains-github-archive? uri))))
    (uri1				;match string
     (contains-github-archive? uri1))))

(define (problematic-github-package? package)
  (let ((source (package-source package)))
    (and (origin? source)
	 (eq? (origin-method source) url-fetch)
	 (problematic-uri? (origin-uri source)))))

(define (problematic-github-packages)
  "List of all the potentially problematic GitHub packages."
  (fold-packages (lambda (p r)
		   (if (problematic-github-package? p)
		       (cons p r)
		       r))
		 '()))
(define (main)
  "Find and print the names of the potentially problematic GitHub packages."
  (let ((packages (problematic-github-packages)))
    (format #t "Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages: ~a~%"
	    (length packages))
    (for-each (lambda (p)
		(format #t "~a~%" (package-name p)))
	      packages)))

;;; Run the program.
(main)

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 350 bytes --]


And sample output:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
Number of potentially problematic GitHub packages: 650
fdupes
cbatticon
cpulimit
thefuck
thermald
neofetch
autojump
progress
nnn
[...]
wxwidgets
xclip
xcape
sxhkd
maim
slop
tinyxml2
xlsx2csv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Maxim

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Maxim Cournoyer]

I've modified the script to sort the packages it prints:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
-    (for-each (lambda (p)
-		(format #t "~a~%" (package-name p)))
-	      packages)))
+    (for-each (lambda (name)
+		(format #t "~a~%" name))
+	      (sort (map package-name packages) string<?))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

and compared it to the list here: https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044

If we can trust the Homebrew list to be extensive, it seems we got
lucky; there's only one affected package that we share which is
yaml-cpp. Here's how it fails on our side:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix build -S --no-substitutes yaml-cpp
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/mlap8jmadirnbii6sppb6vj9x56s8azw-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz.drv
@ build-started /gnu/store/mlap8jmadirnbii6sppb6vj9x56s8azw-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/ml//ap8jmadirnbii6sppb6vj9x56s8azw-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz.drv.bz2

Starting download of /gnu/store/qwflwafrzjbr2b7dy4nv18nxykghhmnk-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz
From https://github.com/jbeder/yaml-cpp/archive/yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz...
following redirection to `https://codeload.github.com/jbeder/yaml-cpp/tar.gz/yaml-cpp-0.5.3'...
 ...p-0.5.3                                  1.7MiB/s 00:01 | 1.9MiB transferred
sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/qwflwafrzjbr2b7dy4nv18nxykghhmnk-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz'
  expected: 1vk6pjh0f5k6jwk2sszb9z5169whmiha9ainbdpa1arxlkq7v3b6
  actual:   1ck7jk0wjfigrf4cgcjqsir4yp1s6vamhhxhpsgfvs46pgm5pk6y
@ build-failed /gnu/store/mlap8jmadirnbii6sppb6vj9x56s8azw-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz.drv - 1 sha256 hash mismatch for output path `/gnu/store/qwflwafrzjbr2b7dy4nv18nxykghhmnk-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz'
  expected: 1vk6pjh0f5k6jwk2sszb9z5169whmiha9ainbdpa1arxlkq7v3b6
  actual:   1ck7jk0wjfigrf4cgcjqsir4yp1s6vamhhxhpsgfvs46pgm5pk6y
guix build: error: build failed: build of
`/gnu/store/mlap8jmadirnbii6sppb6vj9x56s8azw-yaml-cpp-0.5.3.tar.gz.drv'
failed
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Maxim

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Maxim Cournoyer writes:

> If we can trust the Homebrew list to be extensive, it seems we got
> lucky; there's only one affected package that we share which is
> yaml-cpp. Here's how it fails on our side:

I needed to also use (ice-9 regex) and then I found these to fail

    antlr3
    csound
    erlang
    font-google-material-design-icons
    fritzing
    libgit2
    lxqt-common
    ogre
    plexus-interpolation
    red-eclipse
    yaml-cpp

out of 646 packages it's not many but it includes our core dependency
libgit2 which breaks guix pull --no-substitutes; that's hardly being
lucky?

janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> As reported by laertus on irc[0]: guix pull on 0.13 without substitutes fails

I just checked and we do have substitutes, but I understand it doesn’t
help here.

>       guix pull
>
>     Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.3r6cH0
>     From https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/snapshot/master.tar.gz...
>      ….tar.gz                                   5.7MiB/s 00:02 | 13.6MiB transferred
>     unpacking '/gnu/store/sginfwnrcfqn1far31gmzlaffd8xlxyy-guix-latest.tar.gz'...
>
>     Starting download of /gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz
>     From https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/archive/v0.25.1.tar.gz...
>     following redirection to `https://codeload.github.com/libgit2/libgit2/tar.gz/v0.25.1'...
>      v0.25.1                                     6.1MiB/s 00:01 | 4.1MiB transferred
>     output path `/gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s', instead has `0ywcxw1mwd56c8qc14hbx31bf198gxck3nja3laxyglv7l57qp26'

What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:

  https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

The problem is that the hash check is performed by guix-daemon itself,
not by “guix perform-download”.  So when guix-daemon diagnoses a hash
mismatch, it’s too late and we cannot try again and use the
content-addressed mirror.

A crude but helpful fix would be to have perform-download compute the
hash by itself and act accordingly.  It’s crude because that means that
we’d be computing the hash twice: once in ‘guix perform-download’ and a
second time in guix-daemon.  For archives below ~20 MiB it’s probably OK
though.

Thoughts?

In the future, with the daemon written in Guile, it’s one area where we
could achieve better integration and coordination among the various
pieces.

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:
>
>   https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

Sad indeed!

> The problem is that the hash check is performed by guix-daemon itself,
> not by “guix perform-download”.  So when guix-daemon diagnoses a hash
> mismatch, it’s too late and we cannot try again and use the
> content-addressed mirror.

Why don't we try our content-addressed mirror first?

> A crude but helpful fix would be to have perform-download compute the
> hash by itself and act accordingly.  It’s crude because that means that
> we’d be computing the hash twice: once in ‘guix perform-download’ and a
> second time in guix-daemon.  For archives below ~20 MiB it’s probably OK
> though.
>
> Thoughts?

We may want more guix hackers' viewpoints here, I don't feel very
qualified...As this would be a temporary workaround only until we have

> In the future, with the daemon written in Guile, it’s one area where we
> could achieve better integration and coordination among the various
> pieces.

...it might be fine?

Do we want/need to bring out a new release for this, e.g. 0.13.1, or
even 0.14?  I'm not sure how bad it is that --no-substitutes does not
work.  I think working on guix pull to not compile everything locally
may have priority?

janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 644 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:
> 
>   https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

It seems to me that there are several reasons someone may choose not to
use substitutes. Some of those reasons (reproducibility and security
concerns) are obviated for fixed-output derivations like upstream
sources, and I think it would be fine to still use substitutes for these
derivations.

But the motivations of privacy, self-sufficiency, etc are not addressed
by that idea.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 05:09:39PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:
>> 
>>   https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

Just to be clear: this URL is not that of a substitute, but that of a
content-addressed file (corresponding to the output of a fixed-output
derivation.)

> It seems to me that there are several reasons someone may choose not to
> use substitutes. Some of those reasons (reproducibility and security
> concerns) are obviated for fixed-output derivations like upstream
> sources, and I think it would be fine to still use substitutes for these
> derivations.
>
> But the motivations of privacy, self-sufficiency, etc are not addressed
> by that idea.

Right.  Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before*
the real upstream address.  That would address the problem of upstream
sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency
as you note.  (Though it’s not really making “privacy” any worse in this
case: it’s gnu.org vs. github.com.)

Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
--substitute-urls?  The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
not just URLs; see (guix download).

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Right.  Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before*
> the real upstream address.  That would address the problem of upstream
> sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency
> as you note.  (Though it’s not really making “privacy” any worse in this
> case: it’s gnu.org vs. github.com.)

Yes, that may not preferrable in general without override.

> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
> that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
> --substitute-urls?  The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
> not just URLs; see (guix download).

Hmm.  I'm not sure what problem we are solving.  Should we only do this
for github(-like) tarballs?  Do we see this problem with other sources,
should we prevent it?  Possibly github will never do something like this
again.  Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
go for git checkouts+commits?

janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 654 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:22:33PM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> Hmm.  I'm not sure what problem we are solving.  Should we only do this
> for github(-like) tarballs?  Do we see this problem with other sources,
> should we prevent it?  Possibly github will never do something like this
> again.  Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
> go for git checkouts+commits?

Files referenced by URL (location-addressing vs content-addressing) have
been changed in place by a variety of hosters and upstream projects
since I've started paying attention to these issues. I don't think we
need to do anything special regarding GitHub.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès writes:

[...]

>> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
>> that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
>> --substitute-urls?  The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
>> not just URLs; see (guix download).
>
> Hmm.  I'm not sure what problem we are solving.  Should we only do this
> for github(-like) tarballs?  Do we see this problem with other sources,
> should we prevent it?  Possibly github will never do something like this
> again.  Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
> go for git checkouts+commits?

Content-addressed mirrors help with disappearing and modified tarballs
in general; it’s not just GitHub.

Occasionally we see that problem with tarballs coming from elsewhere:
404 is quite frequent, and in-place modification happens from time to
time (even on ftp.gnu.org…).

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Leo Famulari]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1025 bytes --]

On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:00:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Right.  Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before*
> the real upstream address.  That would address the problem of upstream
> sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency
> as you note.  (Though it’s not really making “privacy” any worse in this
> case: it’s gnu.org vs. github.com.)

Yeah, I don't personally think there is a privacy issue with fetching
sources from our mirrors at gnu.org, or other domains we control.

> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
> that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
> --substitute-urls?  The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
> not just URLs; see (guix download).
>
> Thoughts?

I do think we should make it so that users don't suffer from unreliable
upstream sources when we know the sources are available on our servers
(or the Nix mirror), even with --no-substitutes.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3524 bytes --]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 10:00:33PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Right.  Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before*
>> the real upstream address.  That would address the problem of upstream
>> sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency
>> as you note.  (Though it’s not really making “privacy” any worse in this
>> case: it’s gnu.org vs. github.com.)
>
> Yeah, I don't personally think there is a privacy issue with fetching
> sources from our mirrors at gnu.org, or other domains we control.
>
>> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
>> that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
>> --substitute-urls?  The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
>> not just URLs; see (guix download).
>>
>> Thoughts?
>
> I do think we should make it so that users don't suffer from unreliable
> upstream sources when we know the sources are available on our servers
> (or the Nix mirror), even with --no-substitutes.

The more I think about it, the more I’m inclined to simply move
content-addressed mirrors to the front of the list.  This means that
users, in practice, would be fetching all the source from
mirror.hydra.gnu.org.

The main issue is making it configurable.  Currently the
content-addressed mirror configuration for regular files in (guix
download) looks like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define %content-addressed-mirrors
  ;; List of content-addressed mirrors.  Each mirror is represented as a
  ;; procedure that takes a file name, an algorithm (symbol) and a hash
  ;; (bytevector), and returns a URL or #f.
  ;; Note: Avoid 'https' to mitigate <http://bugs.gnu.org/22774>.
  ;; TODO: Add more.
  '(list (lambda (file algo hash)
           ;; Files served by 'guix publish' are accessible under a single
           ;; hash algorithm.
           (string-append "http://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/"
                          file "/" (symbol->string algo) "/"
                          (bytevector->nix-base32-string hash)))
         (lambda (file algo hash)
           ;; 'tarballs.nixos.org' supports several algorithms.
           (string-append "http://tarballs.nixos.org/"
                          (symbol->string algo) "/"
                          (bytevector->nix-base32-string hash)))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

That for VCS checkouts in (guix build download-nar) looks like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(define (urls-for-item item)
  "Return the fallback nar URL for ITEM--e.g.,
\"/gnu/store/cabbag3…-foo-1.2-checkout\"."
  ;; Here we hard-code nar URLs without checking narinfos.  That's probably OK
  ;; though.
  ;; TODO: Use HTTPS?  The downside is the extra dependency.
  (let ((bases '("http://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/guix"
                 "http://berlin.guixsd.org"))
        (item  (basename item)))
    (append (map (cut string-append <> "/nar/gzip/" item) bases)
            (map (cut string-append <> "/nar/" item) bases))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The latter could be expressed by a command-line flag.  In fact it’s the
same as --substitute-urls.

(Time passes…)

Thinking more about it, why not simply always enable substitutes for
fixed-output derivations, like this:


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/x-patch, Size: 813 bytes --]

diff --git a/nix/libstore/build.cc b/nix/libstore/build.cc
index d68e8b2bc..03a8f5080 100644
--- a/nix/libstore/build.cc
+++ b/nix/libstore/build.cc
@@ -1034,8 +1034,10 @@ void DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
 
     /* We are first going to try to create the invalid output paths
        through substitutes.  If that doesn't work, we'll build
-       them. */
-    if (settings.useSubstitutes && substitutesAllowed(drv))
+       them.  Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations to
+       protect against disappearing files and in-place modifications on
+       upstream sites.  */
+    if ((fixedOutput || settings.useSubstitutes) && substitutesAllowed(drv))
         foreach (PathSet::iterator, i, invalidOutputs)
             addWaitee(worker.makeSubstitutionGoal(*i, buildMode == bmRepair));
 

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]


This solves all our problems and makes download-nar.scm useless.

As an added bonus, it provides a improves the UI since we now always
see:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
0.1 MB will be downloaded:
   /gnu/store/plx9848n6waj6zghn3d54ybx8ihcn23k-guile-git-0.0-4.951a32c-checkout
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

… instead of:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/y86rlb6pdm35im7q02y6479ca84zwylz-guile-git-000.0-4.951a32c-checkout.drv
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The downside is that it still requires one to authorize the server’s
key, although it’s in theory unnecessary since it’s content addressed.
I’m not sure how to solve that because ‘guix substitute’ doesn’t know
that it’s substituting a fixed-output derivation.  I suppose we’d need
to modify the “protocol” between guix-daemon and ‘guix substitute’.

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail

[Ludovic Courtès]

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> Thinking more about it, why not simply always enable substitutes for
> fixed-output derivations, like this:
>
> diff --git a/nix/libstore/build.cc b/nix/libstore/build.cc
> index d68e8b2bc..03a8f5080 100644
> --- a/nix/libstore/build.cc
> +++ b/nix/libstore/build.cc
> @@ -1034,8 +1034,10 @@ void DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
>  
>      /* We are first going to try to create the invalid output paths
>         through substitutes.  If that doesn't work, we'll build
> -       them. */
> -    if (settings.useSubstitutes && substitutesAllowed(drv))
> +       them.  Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations to
> +       protect against disappearing files and in-place modifications on
> +       upstream sites.  */
> +    if ((fixedOutput || settings.useSubstitutes) && substitutesAllowed(drv))
>          foreach (PathSet::iterator, i, invalidOutputs)
>              addWaitee(worker.makeSubstitutionGoal(*i, buildMode == bmRepair));

[...]

> The downside is that it still requires one to authorize the server’s
> key, although it’s in theory unnecessary since it’s content addressed.
> I’m not sure how to solve that because ‘guix substitute’ doesn’t know
> that it’s substituting a fixed-output derivation.  I suppose we’d need
> to modify the “protocol” between guix-daemon and ‘guix substitute’.

I looked at how to address this by having ‘guix substitute’
automatically determine whether it’s being asked for a content-addressed
item or not.  The guts of it is this procedure:

  (define* (content-addressed-item? item hash
                                    #:key (hash-algo 'sha256))
    "Return true if ITEM, a store file name, is definitely a content-addressed
  item (result of a fixed-output derivation) with the given HASH of type
  HASH-ALGO, false otherwise.

  Note: This procedure is useful when the deriver of ITEM is unknown.  In other
  cases, the recommended approach is to check 'fixed-output-derivation?' on the
  deriver."
    ;; XXX: This returns #f for "text" items produced by 'add-text-to-store'.
    ;; There's not much we can do because the file name for these is a function
    ;; of their content.
    (let ((name (store-path-package-name item)))
      (or (string=? item (fixed-output-path name hash #:recursive? #f
                                            #:hash-algo hash-algo))
          (string=? item (fixed-output-path name hash #:recursive? #t
                                            #:hash-algo hash-algo)))))

It works as expected for the result of “recursive fixed-output
derivations”—i.e., fixed-output derivations that produce a directory,
such as VCS checkouts.

However it doesn’t work for fixed-output derivations that produce a flat
file, such as origins with the ‘url-fetch’ method.  The reason is
because in the case of non-recursive derivations, the store file name is
computed as a function of the file hash, not as a function of the nar
hash, whereas narinfos only contains the nar hash (the thing that ‘guix
hash -r’ computes.)

So I think we have to communicate more info from the daemon to ‘guix
substitute’.

Ludo’.

bug#28659: Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations

[Ludovic Courtès]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 876 bytes --]

ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:

> So I think we have to communicate more info from the daemon to ‘guix
> substitute’.

The attached patch addresses that by simply calling out to the daemon to
determine whether we’re dealing with a content-addressed item.

To summarize, the new behavior is that substitutes are always enabled
for fixed-output derivations.  That way, people willing to build
everything from source can still use ‘--no-substitutes’ and yet be able
to retrieve source code without being penalized compared to someone
enabling substitutes wholesale.

Of course, when substitutes are missing, we fall back to regular
downloads or VCS checkouts.  It is also still possible to choose where
substitutes are downloaded from, using ‘--substitute-urls’, or even to
pass an empty list of URLs.

Feedback welcome!

Ludo’.


[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-substitute-Always-allow-substitutes-for-fixed-output.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 5940 bytes --]

From aab42bcb212698bc1f61beb9f321ffbd751f36f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 09:57:04 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] substitute: Always allow substitutes for fixed-output
 derivation results.

Fixes <https://bugs.gnu.org/28659>.

* guix/scripts/substitute.scm (content-addressed-item?): New procedure.
(valid-narinfo?): Use it.
* nix/libstore/build.cc (DerivationGoal::haveDerivation): Always make a
substitution goal when 'fixedOutput' is true.
* tests/substitute.scm ("query unsigned narinfo for content-addressed
item"): New test.
---
 guix/scripts/substitute.scm | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 nix/libstore/build.cc       |  6 ++++--
 tests/substitute.scm        | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/guix/scripts/substitute.scm b/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
index 2fd2bf810..670a9b4dd 100755
--- a/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/substitute.scm
@@ -25,6 +25,9 @@
   #:use-module (guix config)
   #:use-module (guix records)
   #:use-module ((guix serialization) #:select (restore-file))
+  #:use-module ((guix derivations)
+                #:select (read-derivation-from-file
+                          fixed-output-derivation?))
   #:use-module (guix hash)
   #:use-module (guix base32)
   #:use-module (guix base64)
@@ -406,10 +409,36 @@ No authentication and authorization checks are performed here!"
        (let ((above-signature (string-take contents index)))
          (sha256 (string->utf8 above-signature)))))))
 
+(define* (content-addressed-item? item)
+  "Return true if ITEM is content-addressed---i.e., if ITEM is the result of a
+fixed-output derivation."
+  (guard (c ((nix-connection-error? c)
+             ;; We failed to connect, maybe because we have the wrong
+             ;; GUIX_DAEMON_SOCKET?  Let's conservatively assume that
+             ;; nothing's content-addressed.
+             #f))
+    (with-store store
+      (match (valid-derivers store item)
+        (()
+         ;; If there are no valid derivers it's most likely because ITEM is a
+         ;; source (added with 'add-to-store' or similar).  Nevertheless,
+         ;; since we can't be certain, return #f.
+         #f)
+        ((drv . _)
+         (fixed-output-derivation?
+          (read-derivation-from-file drv)))))))
+
 (define* (valid-narinfo? narinfo #:optional (acl (current-acl))
                          #:key verbose?)
-  "Return #t if NARINFO's signature is not valid."
+  "Return #t if NARINFO is \"valid\"---signed by an authorized key, or
+designating a content-addressed item."
   (or %allow-unauthenticated-substitutes?
+
+      ;; If NARINFO designates a content-addressed item, there's no point
+      ;; authenticating it.  Don't explicitly check 'narinfo-hash' for
+      ;; integrity: this will be done by the daemon once we've downloaded it.
+      (content-addressed-item? (narinfo-path narinfo))
+
       (let ((hash      (narinfo-sha256 narinfo))
             (signature (narinfo-signature narinfo))
             (uri       (uri->string (narinfo-uri narinfo))))
diff --git a/nix/libstore/build.cc b/nix/libstore/build.cc
index d68e8b2bc..03a8f5080 100644
--- a/nix/libstore/build.cc
+++ b/nix/libstore/build.cc
@@ -1034,8 +1034,10 @@ void DerivationGoal::haveDerivation()
 
     /* We are first going to try to create the invalid output paths
        through substitutes.  If that doesn't work, we'll build
-       them. */
-    if (settings.useSubstitutes && substitutesAllowed(drv))
+       them.  Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations to
+       protect against disappearing files and in-place modifications on
+       upstream sites.  */
+    if ((fixedOutput || settings.useSubstitutes) && substitutesAllowed(drv))
         foreach (PathSet::iterator, i, invalidOutputs)
             addWaitee(worker.makeSubstitutionGoal(*i, buildMode == bmRepair));
 
diff --git a/tests/substitute.scm b/tests/substitute.scm
index 0ad624795..03579b9f1 100644
--- a/tests/substitute.scm
+++ b/tests/substitute.scm
@@ -21,15 +21,17 @@
   #:use-module (guix scripts substitute)
   #:use-module (guix base64)
   #:use-module (guix hash)
+  #:use-module (guix derivations)
   #:use-module (guix serialization)
   #:use-module (guix pk-crypto)
   #:use-module (guix pki)
   #:use-module (guix config)
   #:use-module (guix base32)
-  #:use-module ((guix store) #:select (%store-prefix))
+  #:use-module ((guix store) #:select (%store-prefix with-store))
   #:use-module ((guix ui) #:select (guix-warning-port))
   #:use-module ((guix build utils)
                 #:select (mkdir-p delete-file-recursively))
+  #:use-module (guix tests)
   #:use-module (guix tests http)
   #:use-module (rnrs bytevectors)
   #:use-module (rnrs io ports)
@@ -241,6 +243,26 @@ a file for NARINFO."
            (lambda ()
              (guix-substitute "--query"))))))))
 
+(test-assert "query unsigned narinfo for content-addressed item"
+  (with-store store
+    (let* ((hash (sha256 (random-bytevector 128)))
+           (drv  (derivation store "content-addressed"
+                             "builtin:download" '()
+                             #:hash-algo 'sha256 #:hash hash)))
+      (define output
+        (with-output-to-string
+          (lambda ()
+            (with-derivation-narinfo drv (sha256 => hash)
+              (with-input-from-string (string-append "have "
+                                                     (derivation->output-path drv))
+                (lambda ()
+                  (set! (@@ (guix scripts substitute)
+                            %allow-unauthenticated-substitutes?)
+                    #f)
+                  (guix-substitute "--query")))))))
+
+      (string=? (string-trim-both output) (derivation->output-path drv)))))
+
 (test-quit "substitute, no signature"
     "no valid substitute"
   (with-narinfo %narinfo
-- 
2.15.1


[-- Attachment #3: 0002-Revert-download-Download-a-nar-when-a-VCS-checkout-f.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 14302 bytes --]

From 9bcf90b99a79f9f3e126cde5fe1cf51b0dfa58aa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:03:39 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "download: Download a nar when a VCS checkout
 fails."

This reverts commit 37ce440dcffa9ff4f5401bacbc9619bd8ea561c1, which is
useless now that substitutes are always enabled for content-addressed
items.
---
 Makefile.am                 |   1 -
 guix/build/download-nar.scm | 125 --------------------------------------------
 guix/cvs-download.scm       |  38 ++++----------
 guix/git-download.scm       |  37 +++----------
 guix/hg-download.scm        |  36 ++++---------
 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 211 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 guix/build/download-nar.scm

diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am
index 85b9ab36d..d2660b0a7 100644
--- a/Makefile.am
+++ b/Makefile.am
@@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ MODULES =					\
   guix/ui.scm					\
   guix/build/ant-build-system.scm		\
   guix/build/download.scm			\
-  guix/build/download-nar.scm			\
   guix/build/cargo-build-system.scm		\
   guix/build/cmake-build-system.scm		\
   guix/build/dub-build-system.scm		\
diff --git a/guix/build/download-nar.scm b/guix/build/download-nar.scm
deleted file mode 100644
index 13f01fb1e..000000000
--- a/guix/build/download-nar.scm
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,125 +0,0 @@
-;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright © 2017 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
-;;;
-;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
-;;;
-;;; GNU Guix is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
-;;; under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
-;;; the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or (at
-;;; your option) any later version.
-;;;
-;;; GNU Guix is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
-;;; WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
-;;; MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
-;;; GNU General Public License for more details.
-;;;
-;;; You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
-;;; along with GNU Guix.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
-
-(define-module (guix build download-nar)
-  #:use-module (guix build download)
-  #:use-module (guix build utils)
-  #:use-module (guix serialization)
-  #:use-module (guix zlib)
-  #:use-module (guix progress)
-  #:use-module (web uri)
-  #:use-module (srfi srfi-11)
-  #:use-module (srfi srfi-26)
-  #:use-module (ice-9 format)
-  #:use-module (ice-9 match)
-  #:export (download-nar))
-
-;;; Commentary:
-;;;
-;;; Download a normalized archive or "nar", similar to what 'guix substitute'
-;;; does.  The intent here is to use substitute servers as content-addressed
-;;; mirrors of VCS checkouts.  This is mostly useful for users who have
-;;; disabled substitutes.
-;;;
-;;; Code:
-
-(define (urls-for-item item)
-  "Return the fallback nar URL for ITEM--e.g.,
-\"/gnu/store/cabbag3…-foo-1.2-checkout\"."
-  ;; Here we hard-code nar URLs without checking narinfos.  That's probably OK
-  ;; though.
-  ;; TODO: Use HTTPS?  The downside is the extra dependency.
-  (let ((bases '("http://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/guix"
-                 "http://berlin.guixsd.org"))
-        (item  (basename item)))
-    (append (map (cut string-append <> "/nar/gzip/" item) bases)
-            (map (cut string-append <> "/nar/" item) bases))))
-
-(define (restore-gzipped-nar port item size)
-  "Restore the gzipped nar read from PORT, of SIZE bytes (compressed), to
-ITEM."
-  ;; Since PORT is typically a non-file port (for instance because 'http-get'
-  ;; returns a delimited port), create a child process so we're back to a file
-  ;; port that can be passed to 'call-with-gzip-input-port'.
-  (match (pipe)
-    ((input . output)
-     (match (primitive-fork)
-       (0
-        (dynamic-wind
-          (const #t)
-          (lambda ()
-            (close-port output)
-            (close-port port)
-            (catch #t
-              (lambda ()
-                (call-with-gzip-input-port input
-                  (cut restore-file <> item)))
-              (lambda (key . args)
-                (print-exception (current-error-port)
-                                 (stack-ref (make-stack #t) 1)
-                                 key args)
-                (primitive-exit 1))))
-          (lambda ()
-            (primitive-exit 0))))
-       (child
-        (close-port input)
-        (dump-port* port output
-                    #:reporter (progress-reporter/file item size
-                                                       #:abbreviation
-                                                       store-path-abbreviation))
-        (close-port output)
-        (newline)
-        (match (waitpid child)
-          ((_ . status)
-           (unless (zero? status)
-             (error "nar decompression failed" status)))))))))
-
-(define (download-nar item)
-  "Download and extract the normalized archive for ITEM.  Return #t on
-success, #f otherwise."
-  ;; Let progress reports go through.
-  (setvbuf (current-error-port) _IONBF)
-  (setvbuf (current-output-port) _IONBF)
-
-  (let loop ((urls (urls-for-item item)))
-    (match urls
-      ((url rest ...)
-       (format #t "Trying content-addressed mirror at ~a...~%"
-               (uri-host (string->uri url)))
-       (let-values (((port size)
-                     (catch #t
-                       (lambda ()
-                         (http-fetch (string->uri url)))
-                       (lambda args
-                         (values #f #f)))))
-         (if (not port)
-             (loop rest)
-             (begin
-               (if size
-                   (format #t "Downloading from ~a (~,2h MiB)...~%" url
-                           (/ size (expt 2 20.)))
-                   (format #t "Downloading from ~a...~%" url))
-               (if (string-contains url "/gzip")
-                   (restore-gzipped-nar port item size)
-                   (begin
-                     ;; FIXME: Add progress report.
-                     (restore-file port item)
-                     (close-port port)))
-               #t))))
-      (()
-       #f))))
diff --git a/guix/cvs-download.scm b/guix/cvs-download.scm
index 8b46f8ef8..85744c5b5 100644
--- a/guix/cvs-download.scm
+++ b/guix/cvs-download.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2014 Sree Harsha Totakura <sreeharsha@totakura.in>
 ;;; Copyright © 2015 Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
 ;;;
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@
   #:use-module (guix gexp)
   #:use-module (guix store)
   #:use-module (guix monads)
-  #:use-module (guix modules)
   #:use-module (guix packages)
   #:use-module (ice-9 match)
   #:export (cvs-reference
@@ -60,35 +59,16 @@
   "Return a fixed-output derivation that fetches REF, a <cvs-reference>
 object.  The output is expected to have recursive hash HASH of type
 HASH-ALGO (a symbol).  Use NAME as the file name, or a generic name if #f."
-  (define zlib
-    (module-ref (resolve-interface '(gnu packages compression)) 'zlib))
-
-  (define config.scm
-    (scheme-file "config.scm"
-                 #~(begin
-                     (define-module (guix config)
-                       #:export (%libz))
-
-                     (define %libz
-                       #+(file-append zlib "/lib/libz")))))
-
-  (define modules
-    (cons `((guix config) => ,config.scm)
-          (delete '(guix config)
-                  (source-module-closure '((guix build cvs)
-                                           (guix build download-nar))))))
   (define build
-    (with-imported-modules modules
+    (with-imported-modules '((guix build cvs)
+                             (guix build utils))
       #~(begin
-          (use-modules (guix build cvs)
-                       (guix build download-nar))
-
-          (or (cvs-fetch '#$(cvs-reference-root-directory ref)
-                         '#$(cvs-reference-module ref)
-                         '#$(cvs-reference-revision ref)
-                         #$output
-                         #:cvs-command (string-append #+cvs "/bin/cvs"))
-              (download-nar #$output)))))
+          (use-modules (guix build cvs))
+          (cvs-fetch '#$(cvs-reference-root-directory ref)
+                     '#$(cvs-reference-module ref)
+                     '#$(cvs-reference-revision ref)
+                     #$output
+                     #:cvs-command (string-append #+cvs "/bin/cvs")))))
 
   (mlet %store-monad ((guile (package->derivation guile system)))
     (gexp->derivation (or name "cvs-checkout") build
diff --git a/guix/git-download.scm b/guix/git-download.scm
index 731e549b3..7397cbe7f 100644
--- a/guix/git-download.scm
+++ b/guix/git-download.scm
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
   #:use-module (guix monads)
   #:use-module (guix records)
   #:use-module (guix packages)
-  #:use-module (guix modules)
   #:autoload   (guix build-system gnu) (standard-packages)
   #:use-module (ice-9 match)
   #:use-module (ice-9 popen)
@@ -78,31 +77,12 @@ HASH-ALGO (a symbol).  Use NAME as the file name, or a generic name if #f."
         (standard-packages)
         '()))
 
-  (define zlib
-    (module-ref (resolve-interface '(gnu packages compression)) 'zlib))
-
-  (define config.scm
-    (scheme-file "config.scm"
-                 #~(begin
-                     (define-module (guix config)
-                       #:export (%libz))
-
-                     (define %libz
-                       #+(file-append zlib "/lib/libz")))))
-
-  (define modules
-    (cons `((guix config) => ,config.scm)
-          (delete '(guix config)
-                  (source-module-closure '((guix build git)
-                                           (guix build utils)
-                                           (guix build download-nar))))))
-
   (define build
-    (with-imported-modules modules
+    (with-imported-modules '((guix build git)
+                             (guix build utils))
       #~(begin
           (use-modules (guix build git)
                        (guix build utils)
-                       (guix build download-nar)
                        (ice-9 match))
 
           ;; The 'git submodule' commands expects Coreutils, sed,
@@ -112,13 +92,12 @@ HASH-ALGO (a symbol).  Use NAME as the file name, or a generic name if #f."
                                            (((names dirs) ...)
                                             dirs)))
 
-          (or (git-fetch (getenv "git url") (getenv "git commit")
-                         #$output
-                         #:recursive? (call-with-input-string
-                                          (getenv "git recursive?")
-                                        read)
-                         #:git-command (string-append #+git "/bin/git"))
-              (download-nar #$output)))))
+          (git-fetch (getenv "git url") (getenv "git commit")
+                     #$output
+                     #:recursive? (call-with-input-string
+                                      (getenv "git recursive?")
+                                    read)
+                     #:git-command (string-append #+git "/bin/git")))))
 
   (mlet %store-monad ((guile (package->derivation guile system)))
     (gexp->derivation (or name "git-checkout") build
diff --git a/guix/hg-download.scm b/guix/hg-download.scm
index 6b25b87b6..842098090 100644
--- a/guix/hg-download.scm
+++ b/guix/hg-download.scm
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ;;; GNU Guix --- Functional package management for GNU
-;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016 Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org>
 ;;; Copyright © 2016 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>
 ;;;
 ;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
   #:use-module (guix store)
   #:use-module (guix monads)
   #:use-module (guix records)
-  #:use-module (guix modules)
   #:use-module (guix packages)
   #:autoload   (guix build-system gnu) (standard-packages)
   #:use-module (ice-9 match)
@@ -60,35 +59,18 @@
   "Return a fixed-output derivation that fetches REF, a <hg-reference>
 object.  The output is expected to have recursive hash HASH of type
 HASH-ALGO (a symbol).  Use NAME as the file name, or a generic name if #f."
-  (define zlib
-    (module-ref (resolve-interface '(gnu packages compression)) 'zlib))
-
-  (define config.scm
-    (scheme-file "config.scm"
-                 #~(begin
-                     (define-module (guix config)
-                       #:export (%libz))
-
-                     (define %libz
-                       #+(file-append zlib "/lib/libz")))))
-
-  (define modules
-    (cons `((guix config) => ,config.scm)
-          (delete '(guix config)
-                  (source-module-closure '((guix build hg)
-                                           (guix build download-nar))))))
-
   (define build
-    (with-imported-modules modules
+    (with-imported-modules '((guix build hg)
+                             (guix build utils))
       #~(begin
           (use-modules (guix build hg)
-                       (guix build download-nar))
+                       (guix build utils)
+                       (ice-9 match))
 
-          (or (hg-fetch '#$(hg-reference-url ref)
-                        '#$(hg-reference-changeset ref)
-                        #$output
-                        #:hg-command (string-append #+hg "/bin/hg"))
-              (download-nar #$output)))))
+          (hg-fetch '#$(hg-reference-url ref)
+                    '#$(hg-reference-changeset ref)
+                    #$output
+                    #:hg-command (string-append #+hg "/bin/hg")))))
 
   (mlet %store-monad ((guile (package->derivation guile system)))
     (gexp->derivation (or name "hg-checkout") build
-- 
2.15.1

bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

[zimoun]

Hi Ludo,

On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 10:30, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:

>> So I think we have to communicate more info from the daemon to ‘guix
>> substitute’.
>
> The attached patch addresses that by simply calling out to the daemon to
> determine whether we’re dealing with a content-addressed item.

WDYT to rebase this patch [1] and resubmit to guix-patches in order to
get more attention and so potential feedback and/or review?

1: <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659#26>


Cheers,
simon

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Hi,

Trying to travel back to Sun Apr 7 22:07:14 2019 +0200 (commit
56e95d54d209c2428f970d65d9b27ae4168449ad) to re-create mcrl2-minimal by
doing

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
guix time-machine --commit=56e95d54d209c2428f970d65d9b27ae4168449ad -- environment --ad-hoc mcrl2-minimal
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

fails with

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
building /gnu/store/cjim33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv...
downloading from https://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2...
|offloading build of /gnu/store/6fgg1irkcvqyb4f9f8n0nzi5gknyqhfn-gcc-mesboot1-4.7.4.drv to 'kluit.dezyne.org'
- 'build' phasesha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2:
  expected hash: 1mpah6kwqid1kxsj4rwqsniivqbrx231j65v51yncx6s0dch0dch
  actual hash:   0vrkvdlmihdg62a4c6h5kx27khc33xmb95l50zgnwnavvpwyyw5l
hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2'
build of /gnu/store/cjim33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv failed
View build log at '/var/log/guix/drvs/cj/im33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv.bz2'.
cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/p6gfcdacjcqf2br0zwsyzx1chfvg9gxi-harfbuzz-2.4.0.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
killing process 5083
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The recipe for harfbuzz has a sha256 that used to be valid in April, but
hasn't been valid anymore since May, as this fix

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
commit a8bb8fccd82a10a46f127b2235675b4f6cbaaf98
Author: Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
Date:   Sat May 4 18:01:12 2019 +0200

    gnu: harfbuzz: Update source hash.
    
    The previous tarball was modified in-place; see
    <https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/issues/1641>.
    
    * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (harfbuzz)[source](sha256): Update.
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

shows.  Thoughts?

Greetings,
janneke


-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hi,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> building /gnu/store/cjim33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv...
> downloading from https://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2...
> |offloading build of /gnu/store/6fgg1irkcvqyb4f9f8n0nzi5gknyqhfn-gcc-mesboot1-4.7.4.drv to 'kluit.dezyne.org'
> - 'build' phasesha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2:
>   expected hash: 1mpah6kwqid1kxsj4rwqsniivqbrx231j65v51yncx6s0dch0dch
>   actual hash:   0vrkvdlmihdg62a4c6h5kx27khc33xmb95l50zgnwnavvpwyyw5l
> hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2'

The problem here is really that we fall back to content-addressed
mirrors instead of using them directly:

  https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659

The file itself is still available on our machines though, and you can
get it with:

  guix download -o harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2 \
  https://ci.guix.gnu.org/file/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2/sha256/0vrkvdlmihdg62a4c6h5kx27khc33xmb95l50zgnwnavvpwyyw5l

  guix download file://$PWD/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2

After that, re-running ‘guix time-machine’ should work.

Using ci.guix.gnu.org for substitutes should have the same effect.

HTH,
Ludo’.

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

[Jan Nieuwenhuizen]

Ludovic Courtès writes:

> Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:
>
>> building /gnu/store/cjim33x0q1bv1ppkv3qijvr1pvsn4y0q-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2.drv...
>> downloading from https://www.freedesktop.org/software/harfbuzz/release/harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2...
>> |offloading build of /gnu/store/6fgg1irkcvqyb4f9f8n0nzi5gknyqhfn-gcc-mesboot1-4.7.4.drv to 'kluit.dezyne.org'
>> - 'build' phasesha256 hash mismatch for /gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2:
>>   expected hash: 1mpah6kwqid1kxsj4rwqsniivqbrx231j65v51yncx6s0dch0dch
>>   actual hash:   0vrkvdlmihdg62a4c6h5kx27khc33xmb95l50zgnwnavvpwyyw5l
>> hash mismatch for store item '/gnu/store/b4cdp9sp44848348lrpzbfafhmjqf8nr-harfbuzz-2.4.0.tar.bz2'
>
> The problem here is really that we fall back to content-addressed
> mirrors instead of using them directly:
>
>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659

Wait, what happened here; you finally proposed a patch two years ago and
nothing happened/we all forgot to follow up?

I cannot determine if possibly we were hoping to "wait" for the guile
build daemon?

janneke

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com

bug#39575: guix time-machine fails when a tarball was modified in-place

[Ludovic Courtès]

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> Ludovic Courtès writes:

[...]

>> The problem here is really that we fall back to content-addressed
>> mirrors instead of using them directly:
>>
>>   https://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659
>
> Wait, what happened here; you finally proposed a patch two years ago and
> nothing happened/we all forgot to follow up?

I think we forgot, indeed.

One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix
substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’.

Also, one could argue that we’d steer users towards downloading from our
server, which could be a privacy concern (probably not a strong argument
since one can easily change the substitute URLs.)

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

[zimoun]

Hi,

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix
> substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’.

What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about
tar “disarchive” and SWH?

Related:
 - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39575
 - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/42162
 - https://git.ngyro.com/disarchive/
 
All the best,
simon

[1] http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/28659#26

bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash

[Ludovic Courtès]

Hello,

zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:

> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix
>> substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’.
>
> What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about
> tar “disarchive” and SWH?
>
> Related:
>  - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39575
>  - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/42162
>  - https://git.ngyro.com/disarchive/

Thanks for the reminder.  I don’t think Timothy’s work changes anything
wrt. to this issue: it would still need to be addressed.

Ludo’.