From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id wKQDAddF+2GLLAAAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 04:02:47 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id kC3ROdZF+2EeJQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2022 04:02:46 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6537146AC for ; Thu, 3 Feb 2022 04:02:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:37038 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSOT-0008Om-Bd for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:02:45 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:53774) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSO0-00082e-Kc for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:02:16 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:60199) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSNm-0002HL-94 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:02:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSNm-0003BM-0K for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:02:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:02:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 28659 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Received: via spool by 28659-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B28659.164385731812069 (code B ref 28659); Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:02:01 +0000 Received: (at 28659) by debbugs.gnu.org; 3 Feb 2022 03:01:58 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:54096 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSNi-00038O-En for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:01:58 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f43.google.com ([209.85.221.43]:36564) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1nFSNf-000321-Nc for 28659@debbugs.gnu.org; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:01:57 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f43.google.com with SMTP id u15so2206676wrt.3 for <28659@debbugs.gnu.org>; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 19:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGn3apm5WOKK7Rzh/EQcECU8VfP0ZYx5sULPR6kCieg=; b=qaAiydBHaEfudPLGTy1NrvnrmdpnBYeeNSA8Olq5QtOL4bGjGvRJ++f6i1ARSulewu GyilGzkrVZCZ2OxnCA1SJpMXN0+pjDxlPNbkvR4PeQ/p34iwlcsPTu3/PFD0JVnyEyWJ Jriuiclu5efAGVIGSIohyJLuay7GfIHTEmYjusNefieJS4evVrU0v/ysHV9KbDw7lev+ JYb17nbgUDTEh57O5YGWWIsLfYAjjpXXRfBH3axaH3Rg/yfhD1TiMPJXRMRpvVuGuN9r /bIX0EVkLNC0VPX6YKlSAzTqQEypiiJx4U8gvZPkpe9lKztl78e/yyT6ElhC73s9l7yR nWiw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rGn3apm5WOKK7Rzh/EQcECU8VfP0ZYx5sULPR6kCieg=; b=IOR9cfKiiwqCyuTr7Q77hQjFs80caz1lsn9B/48hBsS5InFOI9e+/PFNSWMzZAWluk Jk1ivjNEbuu7vX0UDdkyjVi0PXQcyk1BirdqM8n7GPhxnzG0SQKdvS+iXwZ17exkTxHK B6eDQ8bhmHdQOnwEdAqZ2pzYYd5yvT22NJtQRQz/H1t9jqjHbhOO4/dWpOmt63kazEX9 VHMSUZpeH15yrIm6Vuii9XSWM1sT0pIyomERrW85uvxlhYeO5DuHE9JnCExF9m9a8/zt d+TsG5d43+hI5i4GjdEKuRkZw8GYq99wsz2TCvxKhz0hlCQA2Gbcz3VzXodSda2xLuxI RGqA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wqmsgA4+BRlHlQoK7zUSxuwb2HRfPS+AHvdt+Gfo22WtejyQU HJhKPFOW4+jkwc0dfRMtirw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2jwA4PvpXbEKNk8+9uEZu5MlLjFkqNLljDDIRDDsh0dimFg0fP6yvnlUL+8RQLd0nvrMYqA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:f3d0:: with SMTP id g16mr1018064wrp.629.1643857309663; Wed, 02 Feb 2022 19:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lili ([2a01:e0a:59b:9120:65d2:2476:f637:db1e]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j9sm4505877wro.8.2022.02.02.19.01.48 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Feb 2022 19:01:49 -0800 (PST) From: zimoun References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org> <20171002182208.GB10773@jasmine.lan> <878tgt721q.fsf@gnu.org> <20171020211700.GA32355@jasmine.lan> <87d1421qek.fsf@gnu.org> <874lot9rou.fsf@gnu.org> <87a7ykmj7k.fsf_-_@gnu.org> Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 03:58:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87a7ykmj7k.fsf_-_@gnu.org> ("Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?="'s message of "Fri, 15 Dec 2017 10:30:39 +0100") Message-ID: <86zgn8zmel.fsf_-_@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1643857366; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=rGn3apm5WOKK7Rzh/EQcECU8VfP0ZYx5sULPR6kCieg=; b=NLZqEdiyD11jI0soHOZisWLN2qmbK3V3AfLo8V+zf0MoX44mifZp7vCVUJ1ZqtKcGvwySz I25VXLEtcFRXH0HR4NTTeKLDAMNLvfbfAMzTKMLOPX//IFo2v4W/6y78PIZ+XzlCVX4Jb/ rYjx756iBvBj7FPQ0AflTSiP9vzC/VpIUgIMwkwBhfURjy8CzTktohqzBg19+94QX6AXhd IndBKifRlJRduQlRo0yIikf7tLUinqm8ha0SVhfiY/gAV2laed9nzg5GpguwrmafcojuVc U7foYs3gyx45WiQcmmxzj4KxY6WbTn8IWQ8hIpVsZr+P7SuhviPlmPRoIEYsOg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1643857366; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rsEL7Vk673pACG/STcES6ka+0gbl4W+YAQ2RjUGcL8wW2SrepYnPw9zM8X+At0RupdQ35Z n3VGVXrFXU5vKr24CNfelWvhAbFPFis0QMhJIMpWXkXyJeVcxA+x1BzZ5Siv18aDEUk66g s8lUORKX7B4rDq/6RjoTYx6zXXSYzLwIYFUdRiTV7dgzGyrw8AvR9OqvlLSIUAu0oiabcE Dy2BQGxanTRKzbuoqqVxTrpS4De7msegMXyyRYYLwAJAuAYyCKQUPoli2EXLpz5sU26X+3 oYACRg3zlCH8LN0QWe+s5uRHfN+6F66d93PXulbrkIZrq+j68D7U5dXMBQVbfg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qaAiydBH; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=qaAiydBH; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A6537146AC X-Spam-Score: -2.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: ZWthSv7WPF7n Hi Ludo, On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 at 10:30, ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Court=C3=A8s) wrote: >> So I think we have to communicate more info from the daemon to =E2=80=98= guix >> substitute=E2=80=99. > > The attached patch addresses that by simply calling out to the daemon to > determine whether we=E2=80=99re dealing with a content-addressed item. WDYT to rebase this patch [1] and resubmit to guix-patches in order to get more attention and so potential feedback and/or review? 1: Cheers, simon