From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 10:24:49 -0400 Message-ID: <20171003142449.GB23431@jasmine.lan> References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp4e8yk5.fsf@gnu.org> <20171001204237.GA11804@jasmine.lan> <87vajxoavx.fsf@gnu.org> <20171002181929.GA10773@jasmine.lan> <87infx2mmt.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53240) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzO8C-0006Ty-FY for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:25:12 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzO86-0002hF-Gz for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:25:08 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:37723) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dzO86-0002h9-Cq for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:25:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dzO86-0002ti-6j for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 10:25:02 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87infx2mmt.fsf@gmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Maxim Cournoyer Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 06:47:06PM -0400, Maxim Cournoyer wrote: > Leo Famulari writes: > > I wonder, are there really that many affected packages? >=20 > There's a list here: > https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one > of the homebrew project's maintainers. I meant, how many Guix packages use the auto-generated GitHub snapshots? I believe the tell-tale sign is that the download link will have the link text 'Source code', as for this release: https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/releases/tag/v0.26.0 --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEsFFZSPHn08G5gDigJkb6MLrKfwgFAlnTnbEACgkQJkb6MLrK fwgIQA//Wg9T8UTUJy67D5QirTKifuoVyyC/5u8FloLZ/qp/7yPybSUgkM6GixOm GM71mwhUFYnzmRzm0kO0u0bKPudby7lsncrx8ZuI3tekMCeagSqs11nEyAAn+R5x CkFAtKniUi9HAWmucU+VXwFjPwhbmNF30KU2bo3x5sYac/Q6wsyAeUhts3FoyoC0 NY/OYBuY1NmKcRC4cHBP80xymvlDPJsiqNsIKzUDwqqDRxnKZWt1CccgZ3ry8xwz teZchapxM4ppM0wEelSkCkxSc4cJIMARII6FENDZbKJ9vtXr+oIu/KiMWqLSSRaG YACujowNL1LOlLz8NOR4TmeGVC7nvtC2h1RN9e+VOBTiqooBOeIoRsqRTPf+S08I PWx7qMFkoq3SCKCXNq8y+Rw2mM/bu3J7x7J1EkcoX5GBy2rCNdwLKIbWgtmD3fes SC0EnS0TWIfGHMWF1eXSF/RcReVF4WOd4RRhekU3eebm8XFQ6pJe2ojMtK0xClUl Eg+cXV0o/eyLi8GeuFX2t6ecvzdP7yLAOcwDxNquOnHawfDdKSk++6mH6dqRWwsC FyZ3lFI3RHzu//G3m76pj3B8WEe8htHSq6Qm+zKdXVqulmGiyHkvEVvbeK2CsnKb KMmn98/ZtnhBwrJgVjR5pF0zjAtCVSCVZpBtg1CQQEQlyKC4b00= =iPiB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0eh6TmSyL6TZE2Uz--