unofficial mirror of bug-guix@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 17:09:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> (Jan Nieuwenhuizen's message of "Sun, 01 Oct 2017 12:16:07 +0200")

Hello,

Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> skribis:

> As reported by laertus on irc[0]: guix pull on 0.13 without substitutes fails

I just checked and we do have substitutes, but I understand it doesn’t
help here.

>       guix pull
>
>     Starting download of /tmp/guix-file.3r6cH0
>     From https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/snapshot/master.tar.gz...
>      ….tar.gz                                   5.7MiB/s 00:02 | 13.6MiB transferred
>     unpacking '/gnu/store/sginfwnrcfqn1far31gmzlaffd8xlxyy-guix-latest.tar.gz'...
>
>     Starting download of /gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz
>     From https://github.com/libgit2/libgit2/archive/v0.25.1.tar.gz...
>     following redirection to `https://codeload.github.com/libgit2/libgit2/tar.gz/v0.25.1'...
>      v0.25.1                                     6.1MiB/s 00:01 | 4.1MiB transferred
>     output path `/gnu/store/c3npgqn9ag2ypi9bda1g779wwwlcqqrf-libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz' should have sha256 hash `1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s', instead has `0ywcxw1mwd56c8qc14hbx31bf198gxck3nja3laxyglv7l57qp26'

What’s sad here is that we do have the right tarball at:

  https://mirror.hydra.gnu.org/file/libgit2-0.25.1.tar.gz/sha256/1cdwcw38frc1wf28x5ppddazv9hywc718j92f3xa3ybzzycyds3s

The problem is that the hash check is performed by guix-daemon itself,
not by “guix perform-download”.  So when guix-daemon diagnoses a hash
mismatch, it’s too late and we cannot try again and use the
content-addressed mirror.

A crude but helpful fix would be to have perform-download compute the
hash by itself and act accordingly.  It’s crude because that means that
we’d be computing the hash twice: once in ‘guix perform-download’ and a
second time in guix-daemon.  For archives below ~20 MiB it’s probably OK
though.

Thoughts?

In the future, with the daemon written in Guile, it’s one area where we
could achieve better integration and coordination among the various
pieces.

Ludo’.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-02 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-01 10:16 bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-01 19:20 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-01 20:42   ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-01 21:05     ` ng0
2017-10-02 14:57     ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02 18:19       ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-02 22:47         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-03 12:31           ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-03 14:24           ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-04  4:22             ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-04 16:54               ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-04 23:53                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-05  4:52                   ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-05  6:08                     ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-02 15:09 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2017-10-02 17:05   ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-02 18:22   ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-02 20:00     ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02 20:22       ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-02 20:29         ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-03 12:30         ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-20 21:17       ` Leo Famulari
2017-11-28 13:30         ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-14 16:53           ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-15  9:30             ` bug#28659: Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-03  2:58               ` bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash zimoun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o9ppoabw.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=28659@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=janneke@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).