From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:22:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <878tgt721q.fsf@gnu.org> ("Ludovic \=\?utf-8\?Q\?Court\=C3\=A8s\=22'\?\= \=\?utf-8\?Q\?s\?\= message of "Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:00:33 +0200")
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Right. Jan suggested checking the content-addressed mirrors *before*
> the real upstream address. That would address the problem of upstream
> sources modified in-place, but at the cost of privacy/self-sufficiency
> as you note. (Though it’s not really making “privacy” any worse in this
> case: it’s gnu.org vs. github.com.)
Yes, that may not preferrable in general without override.
> Perhaps we should make content-addressed mirrors configurable in a way
> that’s orthogonal to derivations, something similar in spirit to
> --substitute-urls? The difficulty is that content-addressed mirrors are
> not just URLs; see (guix download).
Hmm. I'm not sure what problem we are solving. Should we only do this
for github(-like) tarballs? Do we see this problem with other sources,
should we prevent it? Possibly github will never do something like this
again. Or we could banish github/gitlab(?) auto-generated tarballs and
go for git checkouts+commits?
janneke
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke@gnu.org> | GNU LilyPond http://lilypond.org
Freelance IT http://JoyofSource.com | Avatar® http://AvatarAcademy.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-02 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-01 10:16 bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails; libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-01 19:20 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-01 20:42 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-01 21:05 ` ng0
2017-10-02 14:57 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02 18:19 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-02 22:47 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-03 12:31 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-03 14:24 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-04 4:22 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-04 16:54 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-04 23:53 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-05 4:52 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2017-10-05 6:08 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-02 15:09 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02 17:05 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen
2017-10-02 18:22 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-02 20:00 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-02 20:22 ` Jan Nieuwenhuizen [this message]
2017-10-02 20:29 ` Leo Famulari
2017-10-03 12:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-10-20 21:17 ` Leo Famulari
2017-11-28 13:30 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-14 16:53 ` Ludovic Courtès
2017-12-15 9:30 ` bug#28659: Always enable substitutes for fixed-output derivations Ludovic Courtès
2022-02-03 2:58 ` bug#28659: Content-addressed mirror is not used upon invalid hash zimoun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87a8198fli.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=janneke@gnu.org \
--cc=28659@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=ludo@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).