From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=)
Subject: bug#28659: v0.13: guix pull fails;
	libgit2-0.26.0 and 0.25.1 content hashes fail
Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:31:19 +0200
Message-ID: <87wp4c8lbc.fsf@gnu.org>
References: <877ewf18d4.fsf@gnu.org> <87wp4e8yk5.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20171001204237.GA11804@jasmine.lan> <87vajxoavx.fsf@gnu.org>
	<20171002181929.GA10773@jasmine.lan> <87infx2mmt.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47681)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dzMMq-0001r3-7P
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:32:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dzMMk-0007Tl-FG
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:32:08 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:36690)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1dzMMk-0007TV-CQ
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:32:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1dzMMk-00081G-6M
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2017 08:32:02 -0400
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.28659.B28659.150703389330778@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87infx2mmt.fsf@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Mon, 02
	Oct 2017 18:47:06 -0400")
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: 28659@debbugs.gnu.org

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:

> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> writes:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 02, 2017 at 04:57:38PM +0200, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
>>> Hi!
>>>=20
>>> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>>>=20
>>> > I contacted GitHub about this issue a few weeks ago and they said tha=
t:
>>> >
>>> > 1) They do not guarantee bit-reproducibility of the snapshots they
>>> > generate automatically for each release tag, and they wish that people
>>> > would not rely on them as we do. However, since people *are* relying =
on
>>> > them, they are discussing this issue internally.
>>>=20
>>> Oh?!  Then we=E2=80=99re in trouble.
>>
>> I wonder, are there really that many affected packages?
>
> There's a list here:
> https://github.com/Homebrew/homebrew-core/issues/18044, compiled by one
> of the homebrew project's maintainers.

Interesting.  Thanks for the link!

Ludo=E2=80=99.