From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: encode-time vs decode-time
Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 11:16:33 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83h86gnr4u.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89271843-6d47-8315-ed9a-540657298985@cs.ucla.edu> (message from Paul Eggert on Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:54:07 -0700)
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert@cs.ucla.edu>
> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2019 00:54:07 -0700
> Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>, andrewjmoreton@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
>
> The POSIX tradition is to call these timestamps "broken-down time", and that is
> what glibc calls them too. How about if we use that name instead? It would help
> to be more consistent with other GNU code.
"Broken-down time" will replace "decoded time", I presume? I think
I'm okay with that, but what will we use instead of "encoded time"
then?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-17 8:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-07-29 9:48 Support for sub-second time in decoded time Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 14:03 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-07-29 14:12 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 14:43 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-07-29 15:00 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 17:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-07-30 11:33 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 16:08 ` encode-time vs decode-time Stefan Monnier
2019-07-30 10:32 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-30 11:34 ` Andy Moreton
2019-07-30 11:37 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-30 17:54 ` Paul Eggert
2019-07-30 22:50 ` Paul Eggert
2019-07-31 19:03 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-31 19:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-08-06 1:48 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-06 14:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-06 15:59 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-06 18:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-07 1:02 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-07 2:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-08-07 14:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-11 23:39 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-08-17 6:47 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-07 11:33 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-08-17 7:54 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-17 8:16 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2019-08-17 9:33 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-17 20:46 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-08-17 20:56 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-17 21:42 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-08-17 22:53 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-19 21:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2019-08-21 10:55 ` Adam Porter
2019-08-21 20:20 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-26 10:59 ` Adam Porter
2019-08-26 21:35 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-07 14:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2019-08-07 11:41 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-08-17 9:25 ` Paul Eggert
2019-08-17 20:51 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 14:23 ` Support for sub-second time in decoded time Eli Zaretskii
2019-07-29 14:59 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2019-07-29 16:46 ` Paul Eggert
2019-07-30 11:43 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83h86gnr4u.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=andrewjmoreton@gmail.com \
--cc=eggert@cs.ucla.edu \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).