[bug#28004] Chromium

[Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4291 bytes --]

Björn Höfling <bjoern.hoefling@bjoernhoefling.de> writes:

> Hi Marius,
>
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:06:57 +0100
> Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com> wrote:
>
>> ng0 <ng0@n0.is> writes:
>> 
>> > Marius Bakke transcribed 2.1K bytes:  
>> >> Mike Gerwitz <mtg@gnu.org> writes:
>> >>   
>> >> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 20:01:34 +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:  
>> >> >> If there are no objections, expect to see this in 'master' in
>> >> >> 1-2 weeks.  
>> >> >
>> >> > I want to express gratitude for your hard work on this---given
>> >> > that IceCat does not contain many of the FF devtool updates,
>> >> > Chromium is very desirable for web development.  It's also
>> >> > needed for certain Node.js tools, like node-inspector.
>> >> >
>> >> > So, thank you!  
>> >> 
>> >> Thank *you* for the kind words! :-)
>> >> 
>> >> Here is the latest iteration of this patch.  New in this version:
>> >> 
>> >> * Chromium 64 (duh).
>> >> * The 'delete-bundled-software' phase has been moved to a snippet,
>> >>   shaving ~100MiB (~22%) off the compressed tarball size (and
>> >>   drastically reduces (de)compression time).
>> >> * The New Tab page does not show any thumbnails for new profiles.  
>> >
>> > I think you forgot to attach the patches :)  
>> 
>> Derp.  I realized that and just used `git send-email`[0], but have
>> attached it here for convenience since the debbugs web UI doesn't
>> allow easy download of a raw message.
>> 
>> [0] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=131;bug=28004#131
>> 
>
>
> This looks like a lot of work. Thank you!
>
> I quickly tried to apply and build the patch and have two first remarks:
>
> The file says:
>
> ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017, 2018 Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com>
>
> I haven't followed history, have you worked on this since 2016?

Yeah, I started this shortly after going full-GuixSD in October 2016.
But I didn't submit it until now because I didn't think it met Guix's
standards (and still think it's questionable due to privacy concerns).

> One patch has a hash-mismatch:
>
> Starting download of /gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch
> From https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-chromium/pkg-chromium.git/plain/debian/patches/system/icu.patch?id=debian/64.0.3282.119-2...
>  icu.patch  2KiB                    1.8MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 100.0%
> output path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch' should have sha256 hash `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv', instead has `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> @ build-failed /gnu/store/cqdllqn8ig5wnjn0yqvnh4vlzsvnpzv6-chromium-icu.patch.drv - 1 output path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch' should have sha256 hash `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv', instead has `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/vacxbwsprcp52vp6q975450zi091dak2-chromium-64.0.3282.186.tar.xz.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> @ build-started /gnu/store/7q53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv - x86_64-linux /var/log/guix/drvs/7q//53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv.bz2
> cannot build derivation `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv': 1 dependencies couldn't be built
> guix build: error: build failed: build of `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv' failed
>
> I looked into the file and it looks reasonable, like a patch-file. It has no download errors.
>
> It starts like this:
>
> description: backwards compatibility for older versions of icu
> author: Michael Gilbert <mgilbert@debian.org>
>
> --- a/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> +++ b/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> @@ -627,7 +627,11 @@ RUNTIME_FUNCTION(Runtime_PluralRulesSele
>
> ...
>
> Can you check this file again?

Whoops, indeed.  I had an older patch in my store and apparently forgot
to update the hash.

The correct hash for %chromium-system-icu.patch is:

19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59

Thanks for letting me know!  I'll send an updated patch later, with some
other minor improvements.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 487 bytes --]