From: Mark H Weaver <mhw@netris.org>
To: Raghav Gururajan <rg@raghavgururajan.name>,
Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Cc: Leo Prikler <leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at>
Subject: Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes)
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2021 13:40:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r1j2z079.fsf@netris.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87y2daz13x.fsf@netris.org>
Here's another commit with a blatantly misleading commit log:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/commit/?h=wip-gnome&id=f5fc3c609e2f38ca1c0523deadb9f77d838fbf32
The summary line is "gnu: gdk-pixbuf: Add missing arguments", but in
fact it does all of the following:
(1) Ungrafts 'gdk-pixbuf'.
(2) Updates 'gdk-pixbuf' from 2.40.0 to 2.42.2.
(3) Removes the 'disable-failing-tests' phase.
(4) Adds "#:meson ,meson-0.55" and "#:glib-or-gtk? #t" to the arguments.
Most of the changes above are not mentioned in the commit log at all,
and of course the summary line is extremely misleading.
This commit was digitally signed and pushed to the 'wip-gnome' branch by
Raghav, but it's also "Signed-off-by: Léo Le Bouter", so I'm not sure
who bears primary responsibility for this one.
Mark
--
Support Richard Stallman against the vicious misinformation campaign
against him and the FSF. See <https://stallmansupport.org> for more.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-22 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 96+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-22 0:58 A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 2:41 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 3:17 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:05 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 5:02 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 17:21 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 17:40 ` Mark H Weaver [this message]
2021-04-22 20:06 ` Another misleading commit log (was Re: A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes) Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-22 21:24 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2021-04-22 21:33 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-26 17:17 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-28 16:43 ` Criticisms of my "tone" " Mark H Weaver
2021-04-28 17:55 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-28 20:24 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-29 6:54 ` Joshua Branson
2021-04-29 9:26 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 15:30 ` Matias Jose Seco Baccanelli
2021-04-30 0:57 ` aviva
2021-05-01 17:02 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-05-01 20:07 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-01 22:12 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-01 22:54 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-01 23:15 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 3:13 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 10:31 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-03 9:00 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-03 9:59 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-03 17:00 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 4:17 ` 宋文武
2021-05-02 4:31 ` Leo Famulari
2021-05-02 6:26 ` 宋文武
2021-05-02 15:01 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 19:29 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 20:09 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 21:02 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-05-02 21:58 ` Leo Prikler
2021-05-02 20:59 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-02 21:23 ` Mark H Weaver
[not found] ` <87czu9sr9k.fsf@outlook.com>
2021-05-02 4:33 ` 宋文武
2021-04-22 21:51 ` Another misleading commit log " Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-22 21:49 ` A "cosmetic changes" commit that removes security fixes Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-24 8:09 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-30 0:58 ` aviva
2021-04-22 18:37 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-22 18:48 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 21:50 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-22 4:08 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 11:39 ` 宋文武
2021-04-22 13:28 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-22 20:01 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-22 21:08 ` Christopher Baines
2021-04-22 21:09 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-22 21:21 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-23 17:52 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-23 18:00 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-23 18:38 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2021-04-23 22:06 ` Raghav Gururajan
2021-04-23 18:50 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-23 19:15 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-23 19:18 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-23 19:33 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-23 20:12 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-26 17:06 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-04-26 17:32 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-26 21:56 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-04-26 23:01 ` Leo Famulari
2021-04-24 7:46 ` Mark H Weaver
2021-04-26 14:59 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-26 15:23 ` Tobias Geerinckx-Rice
2021-04-26 17:21 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-04-26 20:07 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-26 17:46 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-28 15:52 ` Marius Bakke
2021-04-29 9:13 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 11:46 ` Leo Prikler
2021-04-29 11:57 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-29 11:41 ` Arun Isaac
2021-04-29 12:44 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-29 14:14 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-04-30 17:40 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-30 19:56 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-05-01 7:23 ` Arun Isaac
2021-05-01 12:40 ` Pjotr Prins
2021-05-01 9:15 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-01 10:18 ` Yasuaki Kudo
2021-05-03 7:18 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-01 14:50 ` Giovanni Biscuolo
2021-05-03 7:25 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-04 2:18 ` Bengt Richter
2021-05-04 6:55 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-05-04 15:43 ` Ludovic Courtès
2021-05-06 17:18 ` Pierre Neidhardt
2021-04-29 16:21 ` Arun Isaac
2021-04-26 19:31 ` Léo Le Bouter
2021-04-27 18:10 ` Andreas Enge
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r1j2z079.fsf@netris.org \
--to=mhw@netris.org \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=leo.prikler@student.tugraz.at \
--cc=rg@raghavgururajan.name \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.