all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* [bug#63320] [PATCH 0/2] Rewrite 'arguments' to gexps with 'guix style -S arguments'
@ 2023-05-05 21:30 Ludovic Courtès
  2023-05-05 21:40 ` [bug#63320] [PATCH 1/2] style: Add 'arguments' styling rule Ludovic Courtès
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2023-05-05 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 63320; +Cc: Ludovic Courtès, Julien Lepiller

Hello Guix!

When preparing <https://guix.gnu.org/en/blog/2021/the-big-change/>, I didn’t
consider converting ‘arguments’ from sexps to gexps a priority.  In practice,
we’ve been doing that manually ever since but there’s a sort of a “contamination”
aspect: due to inheritance, we often have to be careful enough to convert
multiple packages at once or to not change anything, or we end up with gexp
records inside sexps¹.  Automation appears to be overdue.

The attached patches add ‘guix style -S arguments’, which rewrites ‘arguments’
from sexps to gexps.  The change doesn’t involve any rebuild, so we could even
run it en masse on the whole repo and be done with it.

Some caveats:

  • The reader in (guix read-print) doesn’t support sexp comments (#;), which
    are used in a couple of packages.  Thus,

      ./pre-inst-env guix style -S arguments

    which traverses all the packages eventually chokes on it.

  • The pretty printer does not insert a newline after #:phases, which makes
    the space for (modify-phases …) expressions sometimes too narrow.  (This
    is not new; try ‘./pre-inst-env guix style PACKAGE’.)

  • More generally, the pretty printer’s output still has occasional glitches,
    sufficiently that running ‘guix style -S arguments’ on the whole repo may
    not be a good idea at the moment.

  • Some modules lack #:use-module (guix gexp), but this has to be added
    manually.

  • We might want an optional conservative policy to leave arguments that
    would not use gexps unchanged.  For instance, we could leave
    (arguments '(#:tests? #f)) unchanged instead of rewriting it to
    (arguments (list #:tests? #f)).

Thoughts?

Ludo’.

¹ This is what prompted Chris to improve error detection:
  <https://issues.guix.gnu.org/63263>.


Ludovic Courtès (2):
  style: Add 'arguments' styling rule.
  DRAFT news: Add entry to 'guix style -S arguments'.

 doc/guix.texi          |  51 ++++++++++++
 etc/news.scm           |  16 ++++
 guix/scripts/style.scm | 173 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tests/style.scm        | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


base-commit: 3c91f4ca490a7ac56dc0aebbca9c4bf4df201877
-- 
2.39.2





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-05-18 18:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-05-05 21:30 [bug#63320] [PATCH 0/2] Rewrite 'arguments' to gexps with 'guix style -S arguments' Ludovic Courtès
2023-05-05 21:40 ` [bug#63320] [PATCH 1/2] style: Add 'arguments' styling rule Ludovic Courtès
2023-05-05 21:40 ` [bug#63320] [PATCH 2/2] DRAFT news: Add entry to 'guix style -S arguments' Ludovic Courtès
2023-05-06 10:43   ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
2023-05-18 18:10 ` bug#63320: [PATCH 0/2] Rewrite 'arguments' to gexps with " Ludovic Courtès

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.