From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>,
Christopher Baines <mail@cbaines.net>,
Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org>,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>,
Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>,
61255@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack"
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2023 19:57:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877cwmk8yb.fsf_-_@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230203221409.15886-2-maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> (Maxim Cournoyer's message of "Fri, 3 Feb 2023 17:14:04 -0500")
Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
> Rationale: the upcoming rpm-archive builder will also use it.
>
> * guix/scripts/pack.scm:
> (keyword-ref): New top-level procedure, extracted from...
> (debian-archive): ... here. Adjust usages accordingly.
Commit aeded14b8342c1e72afd014a1bc121770f8c3a1c added #:extra-options,
which is why we need ‘keyword-ref’ now.
I’m thinking a different option would be to use #:allow-other-keys in
all the image build procedures. That way the deb and rpm build
procedures would get their extra arguments, which would be automatically
bound without requiring manual ‘keyword-ref’ calls. Sounds a bit nicer
maybe?
If we skip to the current approach, we should consider using
‘let-keywords’ from (ice-9 optargs) instead of adding ‘keyword-ref’.
Anyway, not a blocker IMO, but something to keep in mind.
Ludo’.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-12 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-03 16:19 [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 1/5] pack: Extract keyword-ref procedure from debian-archive Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 2/5] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-04 1:11 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-04 3:43 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 15:12 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-23 15:44 ` [bug#61255] (%guile-for-build) default in ‘computed-file’ Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-24 2:38 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 15:10 ` bug#61841: bug#61255: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-27 16:41 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 21:08 ` bug#61841: ‘guix shell’ computes different package derivation than ‘guix build’ Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-28 2:25 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 3/5] pack: Extract populate-profile-root from self-contained-tarball/builder Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 4/5] tests: pack: Fix indentation Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:20 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 15:22 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-23 15:47 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-23 22:20 ` Feedback on indentation rules (was: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack") Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 19:14 ` Efraim Flashner
2023-03-01 15:17 ` Feedback on indentation rules Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-06 16:56 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-07 13:46 ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-07 16:54 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-07 17:29 ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-09 13:55 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-15 16:15 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-17 16:16 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 5/5] pack: Add RPM format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:52 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 22:17 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:57 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
2023-02-16 15:25 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 0/8] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 1/8] .dir-locals: Add let-keywords indentation rules Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 2/8] pack: Use let-keywords instead of keyword-ref Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 3/8] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 4/8] pack: Extract populate-profile-root from self-contained-tarball/builder Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 5/8] tests: pack: Fix indentation Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 6/8] pack: Add RPM format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 7/8] etc: Add a news entry snippet Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 8/8] news: Add entry for the new 'rpm' guix pack format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 6:34 ` Julien Lepiller
2023-02-17 17:32 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 15:12 ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877cwmk8yb.fsf_-_@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=61255@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
--cc=mail@cbaines.net \
--cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
--cc=me@tobias.gr \
--cc=othacehe@gnu.org \
--cc=rekado@elephly.net \
--cc=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.