Feedback on indentation rules (was: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack")

[Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>]

-CC bug#61255
+CC guix-devel

Hi Ludovic and guix-devel readers,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> writes:
>>

[...]

>>> I’m not convinced by the indentation rule for ‘gexp->derivation’ added
>>> in 82daab42811a2e3c7684ebdf12af75ff0fa67b99: there’s no reason to treat
>>> ‘gexp->derivation’ differently from other procedures.
>>
>> The benefit I saw was that writing
>>
>>  (gexp->derivation the-name
>>   #~(begin
>>      (the
>>        (multi-line
>>         (gexp)))))
>
> I understand, but you know, it’s best to avoid unilaterally changing
> established conventions.  :-)
>
> If and when there’s consensus about this change, (guix read-print)
> should be updated.

OK.  I'm not against soliciting more opinions; I'm CC'ing guix-devel,
hoping some opinionated individuals tip in on this 2021
82daab42811a2e3c7684ebdf12af75ff0fa67b99 commit, more specifically, the
part that change the indentation rules for .dir-locals.el like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
+   (eval . (put 'gexp->derivation 'scheme-indent-function 1))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

In the same spirit there was also
b1c25e2ce364741d1c257d3bb3ab773032807a80 (".dir-locals.el: Add
indentation rule for computed-file.") made more recently (last month).

The idea was to be able to format gexp->derivation like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
          (gexp->derivation "check-deb-pack"
            (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
              #~(begin
                  (use-modules (guix build utils)
                               (ice-9 match)
                               (ice-9 popen)
                               (ice-9 rdelim)
                               (ice-9 textual-ports)
                               (rnrs base))
[...]
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

Rather than like this:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
          (gexp->derivation "check-deb-pack"
                            (with-imported-modules '((guix build utils))
                              #~(begin
                                  (use-modules (guix build utils)
                                               (ice-9 match)
                                               (ice-9 popen)
                                               (ice-9 rdelim)
                                               (ice-9 textual-ports)
                                               (rnrs base))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

(or having to use another 'builder' variable, for example).

What do you all think?

-- 
Thanks,
Maxim