all messages for Guix-related lists mirrored at yhetil.org
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Simon Tournier <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
To: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>,
	"Maxim Cournoyer" <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com>
Cc: efraim@flashner.co.il, guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Feedback on indentation rules
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2023 14:46:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <861qm0broc.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87cz5l95ts.fsf@gnu.org>

Hi,

On Mon, 06 Mar 2023 at 17:56, Ludovic Courtès <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Thanks for the feedback.  I wonder if some are of the opinion that since
>> gexp->derivation is a plain function rather than a syntax having a
>> special form for its 2nd argument, we should leave the default
>> indentation rules untouched for it?
>
> Yes, that’s my take and current practice so far: special rules for
> special forms (macros), not for procedures.

What is the rationale?  Being able to know directly at the location when
it is a plain function or a special form?

For what it is worth, I do not see an high difference between the both
indentations.  So, my opinion would to keep the current practise.


Cheers,
simon


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-07 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-03 16:19 [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 1/5] pack: Extract keyword-ref procedure from debian-archive Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 2/5] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-04  1:11     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-04  3:43       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:14         ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 15:12           ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-23 15:44             ` [bug#61255] (%guile-for-build) default in ‘computed-file’ Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-24  2:38               ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 15:10               ` bug#61841: bug#61255: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-27 16:41                 ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 21:08                   ` bug#61841: ‘guix shell’ computes different package derivation than ‘guix build’ Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-28  2:25                     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 3/5] pack: Extract populate-profile-root from self-contained-tarball/builder Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 4/5] tests: pack: Fix indentation Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:20     ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 15:22       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-23 15:47         ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-23 22:20           ` Feedback on indentation rules (was: [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack") Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-27 19:14             ` Efraim Flashner
2023-03-01 15:17               ` Feedback on indentation rules Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-06 16:56                 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-07 13:46                   ` Simon Tournier [this message]
2023-03-07 16:54                     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-07 17:29                       ` Simon Tournier
2023-03-09 13:55                         ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-03-15 16:15                     ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-03-17 16:16                       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-03 22:14   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 5/5] pack: Add RPM format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:52     ` [bug#61255] [PATCH 0/5] Add support for the RPM format to "guix pack" Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 22:17       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-12 18:57   ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-02-16 15:25     ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49 ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 0/8] " Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 1/8] .dir-locals: Add let-keywords indentation rules Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 2/8] pack: Use let-keywords instead of keyword-ref Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 3/8] gexp: computed-file: Honor %guile-for-build Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 4/8] pack: Extract populate-profile-root from self-contained-tarball/builder Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 5/8] tests: pack: Fix indentation Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 6/8] pack: Add RPM format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 7/8] etc: Add a news entry snippet Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  1:49   ` [bug#61255] [PATCH v2 8/8] news: Add entry for the new 'rpm' guix pack format Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17  6:34     ` Julien Lepiller
2023-02-17 17:32       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2023-02-17 15:12     ` pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=861qm0broc.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com \
    --cc=efraim@flashner.co.il \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=ludo@gnu.org \
    --cc=maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this external index

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.