unofficial mirror of guix-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Maxime Devos <maximedevos@telenet.be>
To: Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>, guix-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Autotools-generated 'configure' & 'Makefile.in' considered binaries?
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2022 21:24:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bf2fc29d29871346f726b721bc2ac934a7891ab.camel@telenet.be> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <df0abbb256354eaa31a7e63ef2c60595e623b64a.camel@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1845 bytes --]

Liliana Marie Prikler schreef op wo 30-03-2022 om 20:55 [+0200]:
> Note that many autotools-based packages already require the addition of
> autoconf and friends due to being pulled from git.  That being said,
> it's somewhat hard to argue for completely dropping them, because
> a. simply matching files via ".in" suffix would be error-prone
> b. autoreconf should regenerate these files regardless
> Therefore, my counter-proposal would be to just simply always run the
> bootstrap script or autoreconf, even if the respective files are
> tarballed, as well as adding autoconf and automake to the implicit
> native inputs of gnu build system.

It should be possible to look for ‘# Generated by GNU Autoconf’ and ‘#
Makefile.in generated by automake’ lines in some 'find-generated-
autotools-fies’or something.

Adding autoconf & automake seems a bit much to me (gnu-build-system is
not necessarily autotools-build-system, the exact required version of
autoconf & automake can vary), but otherwise your proposal seems good
to me.

> > For some ‘early’ packages (gcc, glibc, binutils, ...), there's a
> > circularity problem
> The obvious solution to which would be to implement m4 in mes :)
> 
> > [B]uilding 'configure' and 'Makefile.in' from source might not always
> > be possible, but WDYT of building 'configure' & 'Makefile.in' from
> > source for packages where it does not result in bootstrapping
> > problems?
> See above, but to reiterate, I'm generally in favor.
> 
> Regarding tooling support, I think autotools should have an option to
> build a non-bootstrapped dist tarball.  If more upstreams produced such
> stripped tarballs, we wouldn't even be having that debate.

Yes, would be nice if upstreams could choose to opt-out.  Or maybe opt-
in instead.

Greetings,
Maxime.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 260 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-30 19:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-30 12:04 Autotools-generated 'configure' & 'Makefile.in' considered binaries? Maxime Devos
2022-03-30 14:31 ` Zhu Zihao
2022-03-31 11:17   ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-31 11:19   ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-31 11:22   ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-31 11:27   ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-30 18:55 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-03-30 19:24   ` Maxime Devos [this message]
2022-03-31  4:22     ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-03-31 11:10       ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-31 18:24         ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-03-31 18:31           ` Maxime Devos
2022-03-31 20:11             ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2022-04-01  8:58 ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-01 10:03   ` Maxime Devos
2022-04-05 12:06     ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-04-06 16:35       ` Maxim Cournoyer
2022-04-10 20:25         ` Ludovic Courtès
2022-05-02 10:55       ` zimoun
2022-04-01  9:12 ` Jonathan McHugh
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-06-29 19:01 Maxime Devos

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://guix.gnu.org/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0bf2fc29d29871346f726b721bc2ac934a7891ab.camel@telenet.be \
    --to=maximedevos@telenet.be \
    --cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).