unofficial mirror of help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 02:05:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r0udz15h.fsf@dataswamp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Y/fKKOM0c68jsAeK@protected.localdomain

Jean Louis wrote:

>> Anyway these stats speak their own language - again 78 875 % -
>> and that also means there should be no reason why the
>> Jenovah Project can't be re-initiated based on these
>> new premises?
>> 
>> Maybe the model should be modernized from a practical POV -
>> but I mean in theory - because if it means the foundation
>> can be re-asserted, there should be no reasons in terms of
>> technology not to persue it, right?
>
> I got one thing, that I don't get it.

It had to do with replicating certain items, affectionally
called artefacts, related to the origin of humanity.

The dangers were absolutely exaggerated but so was my
reputation for "pushing the envelope" recklessly ...

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal




  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-26  1:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-14  7:56 stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15  5:04 ` Chen Zhaoyang
2023-02-15 11:37   ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15  6:59 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-16  6:04   ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-17 17:38     ` Jean Louis
2023-02-18 19:54       ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:15         ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:39           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-18 20:47             ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-19  6:35               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21  7:04                 ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: " Madhu
2023-02-21 12:37                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21 16:35                     ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 19:57                       ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 22:21                       ` Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 23:54                         ` Emanuel Berg
     [not found]                           ` <87h6vetquk.fsf@dataswamp.org>
2023-02-22  1:47                             ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 10:46                         ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 20:18                           ` Jean Louis
2023-02-26  1:05                             ` Emanuel Berg [this message]
2023-02-22 12:32                       ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26  3:08                     ` Madhu
2023-02-26  4:32                       ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26  5:15                         ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26  6:27                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26  7:10                         ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26 16:14                         ` FW: [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-26 16:31                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 17:12                             ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 17:31                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 18:29                                 ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 19:04                                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 20:05                                     ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-27  8:42                         ` Madhu
2023-03-03 14:55                           ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26  6:25                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 16:10                         ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-19  5:58         ` Jean Louis
2023-02-15 12:36 ` full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 14:05   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87r0udz15h.fsf@dataswamp.org \
    --to=incal@dataswamp.org \
    --cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).