From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp)
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2023 13:36:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87edqr3y2j.fsf@dataswamp.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87bklw7ka3.fsf@dataswamp.org
> ;; byte > native: +7%
Another thing I discovered doing this, not all my Elisp is
natively compiled!
It seems .el files that are just loaded, i.e.
with `load-file', are not natively compiled and cached, for
this to happen one has to use `require' from a file that is
itself natively compiled.
But then, uhm, how dow it all start?
As the experiment above show, the increase in speed compared
to byte compilation isn't huge, but it's still
substantial (7%). I'll take it!
--
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-15 12:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 7:56 stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 5:04 ` Chen Zhaoyang
2023-02-15 11:37 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 6:59 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-16 6:04 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-17 17:38 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-18 19:54 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:15 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-18 20:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-19 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21 7:04 ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: " Madhu
2023-02-21 12:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21 16:35 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 19:57 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 22:21 ` Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 23:54 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <87h6vetquk.fsf@dataswamp.org>
2023-02-22 1:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 10:46 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 20:18 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-26 1:05 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-22 12:32 ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 3:08 ` Madhu
2023-02-26 4:32 ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26 5:15 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26 6:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 7:10 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26 16:14 ` FW: [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-26 16:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 17:12 ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 17:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 18:29 ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 19:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 20:05 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-27 8:42 ` Madhu
2023-03-03 14:55 ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26 6:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 16:10 ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-19 5:58 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-15 12:36 ` Emanuel Berg [this message]
2023-02-15 14:05 ` full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87edqr3y2j.fsf@dataswamp.org \
--to=incal@dataswamp.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).