From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
Subject: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2023 08:35:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83ilfyxiw6.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fsb21z1n.fsf@dataswamp.org> (message from Emanuel Berg on Sat, 18 Feb 2023 21:47:16 +0100)
> From: Emanuel Berg <incal@dataswamp.org>
> Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2023 21:47:16 +0100
>
> > But if you think you can do that only once, you are
> > mistaken: basically, each time you want your Lisp to work
> > with a new version of Emacs, you need to recompile your Lisp
> > into *.eln files anew.
>
> ... and when I get a new computer as well?
No, not if the new computer runs the same OS and is capable of running
the same Emacs binary you built on the old one. Just make sure you
don't customize native-comp-driver-options and/or
native-comp-driver-options to include compiler switches that are valid
only for certain CPU architectures. (Customizing those is discouraged
anyway.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-02-19 6:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-14 7:56 stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 5:04 ` Chen Zhaoyang
2023-02-15 11:37 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 6:59 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-16 6:04 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-17 17:38 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-18 19:54 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:15 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-18 20:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-18 20:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-19 6:35 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2023-02-21 7:04 ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: " Madhu
2023-02-21 12:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-21 16:35 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 19:57 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 22:21 ` Native compilation by default? (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Emanuel Berg
2023-02-21 23:54 ` Emanuel Berg
[not found] ` <87h6vetquk.fsf@dataswamp.org>
2023-02-22 1:47 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 10:46 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-23 20:18 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-26 1:05 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-22 12:32 ` Native compilation by default?: Was [Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 3:08 ` Madhu
2023-02-26 4:32 ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26 5:15 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26 6:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 7:10 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-26 16:14 ` FW: [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-26 16:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 17:12 ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 17:31 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 18:29 ` Drew Adams
2023-02-26 19:04 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 20:05 ` Emanuel Berg
2023-02-27 8:42 ` Madhu
2023-03-03 14:55 ` Stefan Monnier via Users list for the GNU Emacs text editor
2023-02-26 6:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2023-02-26 16:10 ` [External] : " Drew Adams
2023-02-19 5:58 ` Jean Louis
2023-02-15 12:36 ` full native compile (was: Re: stats say SBCL is 78 875 % faster than natively compiled Elisp) Emanuel Berg
2023-02-15 14:05 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83ilfyxiw6.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).