From: Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
Date: 05 Aug 2002 11:58:44 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sa0y9bl8fgr.fsf@glip.premonitia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200208042326.g74NQAK03418@aztec.santafe.edu>
RMS = Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
LMI = Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
RMS> I am not interested in hosting Emacs on Common Lisp
LMI> I, for one, would be quite interested in working on a CL Emacs, if
LMI> there was any hope of there being a chance of it succeeding.
I would rather not create yet another Emacs fork.
If you (we?) can convince either XEmacs people or RMS that Common Lisp
is the way to go, I will contribute.
RMS> because that would require adding far too much to it.
Actually, this is a red herring: the amount to be added to Emacs is
minuscule compared to what is already there, and Emacs will not grow
noticeably because of that.
I am pretty sure that Guile+"3 widely used Scheme object systems" is
larger than Common Lisp.
--
Sam Steingold (http://www.podval.org/~sds) running RedHat7.3 GNU/Linux
<http://www.camera.org> <http://www.iris.org.il> <http://www.memri.org/>
<http://www.mideasttruth.com/> <http://www.palestine-central.com/links.html>
"Complete Idiots Guide to Running LINUX Unleashed in a Nutshell for Dummies"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-05 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 0:35 Emacs Lisp and Guile Richard Stallman
2002-07-20 8:37 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-21 20:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24 22:05 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-25 18:07 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 19:16 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-27 18:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-30 12:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-31 5:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-01 19:39 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-01 20:52 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 10:23 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 10:41 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 12:09 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 12:37 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-05 15:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 22:14 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-02 22:53 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 16:15 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 19:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-03 20:33 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-03 20:40 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 22:41 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-04 5:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-04 23:26 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 15:58 ` Sam Steingold [this message]
2002-08-09 18:02 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 3:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-04 23:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:10 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-10 7:17 ` Noah Friedman
2002-08-10 14:01 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 16:52 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-02 17:43 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:08 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:35 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 14:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:13 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:26 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 21:03 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 6:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-07 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-08 7:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 13:40 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:17 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:21 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-10 14:32 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-11 3:55 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-11 8:28 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-12 17:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 6:58 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
[not found] ` <ljr8h4803x.fsf@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
2002-08-13 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:50 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 20:54 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-21 0:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-28 8:17 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-29 17:30 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 4:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2002-11-05 23:28 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-07 4:49 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 20:32 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-09 11:54 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sa0y9bl8fgr.fsf@glip.premonitia.com \
--to=sds@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).