From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: neil@ossau.uklinux.net, raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2002 08:24:01 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200208071424.g77EO1103149@wijiji.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ljlm7lgufb.fsf@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> (message from Marius Vollmer on 05 Aug 2002 18:08:24 +0200)
This assumes that only one thread is running at a time. It wouldn't
work for a machine with multiple CPUs where threads can run at the
same time and the concept of a "thread switch" does not exist. Maybe
we don't want to care about this, which I would be very happy with.
It is useful for Guile to support real parallel execution of threads,
but it is not important for Emacs. Having multiple threads in Emacs
will be very useful, but it is perfectly adequate if only one thread
can run at a time. It is not worth accepting any inconvenience in
Emacs to support parallel execution. Instead, Guile should provide a
way that Emacs can turn it off.
In fact, it would simplify matters greatly if Emacs can specify where
a thread switch may occur. Is that implemented in Guile?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-07 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 0:35 Emacs Lisp and Guile Richard Stallman
2002-07-20 8:37 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-21 20:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-24 22:05 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-25 18:07 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 19:16 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-27 18:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-30 12:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-31 5:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-01 19:39 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-01 20:52 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 10:23 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 10:41 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 12:09 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 12:37 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-05 15:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 22:14 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-02 22:53 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 16:15 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 19:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-03 20:33 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-03 20:40 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 22:41 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-04 5:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-04 23:26 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 15:58 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-09 18:02 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 3:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-04 23:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:10 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-10 7:17 ` Noah Friedman
2002-08-10 14:01 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 16:52 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-02 17:43 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:08 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:35 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 14:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:13 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:26 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 21:03 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 6:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-08-07 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-08 7:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 13:40 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:17 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:21 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-10 14:32 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-11 3:55 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-11 8:28 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-12 17:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 6:58 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
[not found] ` <ljr8h4803x.fsf@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
2002-08-13 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:50 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 20:54 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-21 0:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-28 8:17 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-29 17:30 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 4:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2002-11-05 23:28 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-07 4:49 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 20:32 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-09 11:54 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200208071424.g77EO1103149@wijiji.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=neil@ossau.uklinux.net \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).