From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: raeburn@raeburn.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, mvo@zagadka.ping.de
Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp and Guile
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 14:15:04 -0600 (MDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200207212015.g6LKF4c00874@aztec.santafe.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3k7nq23s1.fsf@laruns.ossau.uklinux.net> (message from Neil Jerram on 20 Jul 2002 09:37:50 +0100)
I think that both these restrictions point in the same direction: the
way forward is to define the primitives by compiling a preprocessed
version of the Emacs source code, not by trying to implement them in
Scheme.
What precisely is "a preprocessed version"? What I think we should do
is modify the code in Emacs so that it works with Scheme.
Unless this picture changes, I don't plan to do any further
significant work on the prototype translator.
Putting aside the issue of the Emacs primitives, which we are going to
handle with C code and should not be implemented in Scheme, does it
need any more work? Not counting those primitives, are there Emacs
Lisp features it does not handle? Or is it adequate as it stands?
(If so, why call it a "prototype"? Why not call it "finished"?)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-21 20:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-20 0:35 Emacs Lisp and Guile Richard Stallman
2002-07-20 8:37 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-21 20:15 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-07-24 22:05 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-25 18:07 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 19:16 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-27 18:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-30 12:20 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-07-31 5:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-01 19:39 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-01 20:52 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 10:23 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 10:41 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-02 12:09 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 12:37 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-05 15:19 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-02 22:14 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-02 22:53 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 16:15 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-03 19:35 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
2002-08-03 20:33 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-08-03 20:40 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-03 22:41 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-04 5:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-08-04 23:26 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 15:58 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-09 18:02 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 3:54 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-04 23:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:10 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-10 7:17 ` Noah Friedman
2002-08-10 14:01 ` Alex Schroeder
2002-08-11 16:52 ` Sam Steingold
2002-08-02 17:43 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-05 16:08 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:35 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 14:51 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:13 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:26 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 21:03 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 6:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-08-10 17:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-07 14:24 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-07 15:38 ` Simon Josefsson
2002-08-08 7:01 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-08 16:06 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-09 16:39 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-12 13:40 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-13 1:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 19:17 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-14 5:15 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:21 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-10 14:32 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-11 3:55 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-11 8:28 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-08-12 17:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-13 6:58 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
[not found] ` <ljr8h4803x.fsf@burns.dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
2002-08-13 22:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-14 18:50 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-15 19:53 ` Richard Stallman
2002-08-19 20:54 ` Marius Vollmer
2002-08-21 0:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-28 8:17 ` Neil Jerram
2002-07-29 17:30 ` Richard Stallman
2002-07-25 4:22 ` Ken Raeburn
2002-11-05 23:28 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-07 4:49 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 20:32 ` Neil Jerram
2002-11-09 11:54 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200207212015.g6LKF4c00874@aztec.santafe.edu \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=mvo@zagadka.ping.de \
--cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).