From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: flyspell bug
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E1ETqhP-0003UB-DL@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m23bmsfo4j.fsf@ordesa.local> (message from Piet van Oostrum on Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:50:52 +0200)
No, I think this is the intended behavior. Flyspell is not spell-checking
the whole buffer for you, only the words that you enter, edit, or are about
to edit (i.e. that the cursor is on). It is not like in MS WORD where all
misspelled words are marked. See the Emacs manual:
That is true of Flyspell mode; but he used flyspell-buffer,
which does check the whole buffer.
I think the explanation is that "defun" is not considered a misspelling.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-10-24 1:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 104+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-10-02 17:08 flyspell bug Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-02 20:10 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-02 21:45 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-02 23:28 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-03 15:34 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-03 16:14 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-03 19:31 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-04 8:58 ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-05 3:32 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-05 8:34 ` David Kastrup
2005-10-03 15:35 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-05 10:41 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-05 13:16 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-10 4:15 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-12 8:43 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-13 4:52 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-13 10:40 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-14 5:11 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-14 11:59 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-23 4:42 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-23 11:50 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 1:00 ` Richard M. Stallman [this message]
2005-10-24 7:16 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 13:39 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 14:49 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 23:22 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-25 13:40 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-25 15:59 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-18 15:54 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-19 23:26 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-20 20:36 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-21 8:10 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-24 16:27 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-24 17:51 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 23:22 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-26 16:46 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-27 17:20 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-28 16:19 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-28 13:32 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-28 21:57 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29 0:18 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-29 20:33 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-31 14:50 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-01 10:19 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-02 10:18 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-02 21:30 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-03 14:35 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-04 9:20 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-04 12:27 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-04 14:04 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-04 17:41 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-05 1:37 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-02 10:27 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 15:35 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 15:51 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-16 15:22 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-18 14:51 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-23 10:19 ` flyspell bug [possible patch] Agustin Martin
2005-11-24 3:58 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-24 14:53 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-29 5:13 ` flyspell bug Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-29 10:12 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29 12:11 ` David Kastrup
2005-10-29 19:51 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29 20:34 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-30 13:25 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-31 1:14 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-30 1:14 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-30 12:23 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-28 11:11 ` Agustin Martin
[not found] <E1DR6lU-0005vs-O1@fencepost.gnu.org>
2005-05-07 16:06 ` [mange@freemail.hu: Re: flyspell bug] Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-10 0:06 ` flyspell bug Juri Linkov
2005-05-10 3:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-10 5:04 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-10 19:46 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-11 8:23 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-11 12:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-12 5:29 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-12 6:55 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-12 6:14 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-12 9:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-12 17:13 ` Ken Stevens
2005-05-13 16:09 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13 20:09 ` Ken Stevens
2005-05-14 4:07 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13 1:34 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12 8:30 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-23 14:51 ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-25 1:18 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-25 15:50 ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-26 6:00 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-25 16:48 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-25 18:11 ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-26 6:00 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-11 16:29 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12 5:28 ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-13 1:34 ` Richard Stallman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-25 11:30 Stephen Eglen
2005-04-26 1:28 ` Peter Heslin
2005-04-26 8:30 ` Stephen Eglen
2005-04-26 22:55 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-27 9:13 ` Stephen Eglen
2005-04-27 14:04 ` Magnus Henoch
2005-04-27 16:01 ` Stephen Eglen
2005-05-10 10:40 ` Kai Großjohann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E1ETqhP-0003UB-DL@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).