From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Richard M. Stallman" <rms@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: flyspell bug
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:27 -0400
Message-ID: <E1ETqhP-0003UB-DL@fencepost.gnu.org>
References: <20051013122745.23F5.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
	<E1EQHqT-0002v7-Gc@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<20051014131718.2403.SLAWOMIR.NOWACZYK.847@student.lu.se>
	<E1ETXh0-0003QS-JE@fencepost.gnu.org> <m23bmsfo4j.fsf@ordesa.local>
Reply-To: rms@gnu.org
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1130115647 28687 80.91.229.2 (24 Oct 2005 01:00:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 01:00:47 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 24 03:00:44 2005
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETqhe-0005Uw-JA
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Oct 2005 03:00:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETqhd-0004Nb-NI
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:41 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETqhR-0004Lz-2S
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:29 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1ETqhQ-0004L0-Gg
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ETqhQ-0004Kd-CT
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:28 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.164] (helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ETqhQ-0007wS-4t
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:28 -0400
Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.34)
	id 1ETqhP-0003UB-DL; Sun, 23 Oct 2005 21:00:27 -0400
Original-To: Piet van Oostrum <piet@cs.uu.nl>
In-reply-to: <m23bmsfo4j.fsf@ordesa.local> (message from Piet van Oostrum on
	Sun, 23 Oct 2005 13:50:52 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44656
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/44656>

    No, I think this is the intended behavior. Flyspell is not spell-checking
    the whole buffer for you, only the words that you enter, edit, or are about
    to edit (i.e. that the cursor is on). It is not like in MS WORD where all
    misspelled words are marked. See the Emacs manual:

That is true of Flyspell mode; but he used flyspell-buffer,
which does check the whole buffer.

I think the explanation is that "defun" is not considered a misspelling.