unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: public@heslin.eclipse.co.uk, mange@freemail.hu,
	s.j.eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: flyspell bug
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 15:40:12 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c55626$Blat.v2.4$b81ecf20@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <873bsukw6j.fsf@jurta.org> (message from Juri Linkov on Wed, 11 May 2005 11:23:48 +0300)

> From: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
> Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:23:48 +0300
> 
> ispell and aspell use different dictionaries.  Changing the default
> ispell program name from "ispell" to "aspell" is an incompatible
> change for users configured Emacs to use ispell dictionaries,
> not aspell dictionaries.

I understand that.  What I need is a way to distinguish between three
situations:

  (1) user doesn't have aspell installed
  (2) user has aspell installed, but configured it to use ispell's
      dictionaries
  (3) user has aspell installed and wants to use aspell's dictionaries

I know how to detect (1) -- use locate-file or similar technique to
look for aspell.  But how to distinguish between (2) and (3)?

> `ispell-program-name' can be changed
> automatically to "aspell" only when `ispell-check-version' detects
> aspell's implemention of ispell, i.e. a program for which `ispell -v'
> returns:
> 
> @(#) International Ispell Version 3.1.20 (but really Aspell 0.50.5)

So the conditions for (2) should be:

  (a) locate-file finds an executable `ispell'
  (b) that `ispell', when invoked with -v outputs the above banner

Is that right?  Are we sure that no user will use aspell with ispell's
dictionaries _except_ through the `ispell' alias?

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-11 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 102+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E1DR6lU-0005vs-O1@fencepost.gnu.org>
2005-05-07 16:06 ` [mange@freemail.hu: Re: flyspell bug] Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-10  0:06   ` flyspell bug Juri Linkov
2005-05-10  3:37     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-10  5:04       ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-10 19:46         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-11  8:23           ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-11 12:40             ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-05-12  5:29               ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-12  6:55                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-12  6:14               ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-12  9:09                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-05-12 17:13                   ` Ken Stevens
2005-05-13 16:09                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13 20:09                       ` Ken Stevens
2005-05-14  4:07                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-13  1:34                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12  8:30             ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-23 14:51               ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-25  1:18                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-25 15:50                   ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-26  6:00                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-25 16:48                   ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-25 18:11                     ` Kevin Atkinson
2005-05-26  6:00                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-11 16:29     ` Richard Stallman
2005-05-12  5:28       ` Juri Linkov
2005-05-13  1:34         ` Richard Stallman
2005-10-02 17:08 Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-02 20:10 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-02 21:45   ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-02 23:28     ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-03 15:34     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-03 16:14       ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-03 19:31         ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-04  8:58           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-10-05  3:32             ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-05  8:34               ` David Kastrup
2005-10-03 15:35     ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-05 10:41       ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-05 13:16         ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-10  4:15           ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-12  8:43             ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-13  4:52               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-13 10:40                 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-14  5:11                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-14 11:59                     ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-23  4:42                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-23 11:50                         ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24  1:00                           ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-24  7:16                             ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 13:39                               ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 14:49                                 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 23:22                                 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-25 13:40                                 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-25 15:59                                 ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-18 15:54                                 ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-19 23:26                                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-20 20:36                                     ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-21  8:10                                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-24 16:27                               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-24 17:51                                 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-24 23:22                                 ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-26 16:46                                   ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-27 17:20                                     ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-28 16:19                                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-28 13:32                                     ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-28 21:57                                       ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29  0:18                                       ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-10-29 20:33                                         ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-31 14:50                                           ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-01 10:19                                             ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-02 10:18                                               ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-02 21:30                                                 ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-03 14:35                                                   ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-04  9:20                                                     ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-11-04 12:27                                                       ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-04 14:04                                                       ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-04 17:41                                                         ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-05  1:37                                                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-02 10:27                                               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 15:35                                             ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-11-07 15:51                                             ` Slawomir Nowaczyk
2005-11-16 15:22                                               ` Agustin Martin
2005-11-18 14:51                                                 ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-29  5:13                                       ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-29 10:12                                         ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29 12:11                                           ` David Kastrup
2005-10-29 19:51                                             ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-29 20:34                                           ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-30 13:25                                             ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-31  1:14                                               ` Richard M. Stallman
2005-10-30  1:14                                         ` Agustin Martin
2005-10-30 12:23                                           ` Piet van Oostrum
2005-10-28 11:11                                 ` Agustin Martin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-04-25 11:30 Stephen Eglen
2005-04-26  1:28 ` Peter Heslin
2005-04-26  8:30   ` Stephen Eglen
2005-04-26 22:55     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-27  9:13       ` Stephen Eglen
2005-04-27 14:04         ` Magnus Henoch
2005-04-27 16:01           ` Stephen Eglen
2005-05-10 10:40   ` Kai Großjohann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c55626$Blat.v2.4$b81ecf20@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=mange@freemail.hu \
    --cc=public@heslin.eclipse.co.uk \
    --cc=s.j.eglen@damtp.cam.ac.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).