From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TODO additions
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <E18DrH4-0001zs-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rzq3cpzg600.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (message from Dave Love on 17 Nov 2002 22:56:31 +0000)
> At first it was always done that way.
> Later on some systems we arranged to use cc. So we added the
> ORDINARY_LINK flag for those systems.
So if I understand correctly, ORDINARY_LINK just means use `$(CC)' for
what would normally be the Makefile LINK variable.
Yes.
/* GNU libc requires ORDINARY_LINK so that its own crt0 is used.
Linux is an exception because it uses a funny variant of GNU libc. */
I don't know about the first sentence, but I think the second isn't
true on modern systems,
Could you explain at greater length how it is not true?
and it's not clear whether it would be an
advantage if the gnu-linux configuration was be changed for
configurations using libc6.
I don't understand--what change are you contemplating?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-18 19:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 12:41 TODO additions Dave Love
2002-10-19 3:24 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-21 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 16:47 ` Dave Love
2002-10-21 13:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-21 13:21 ` Oliver Scholz
2002-10-22 14:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 17:03 ` Dave Love
2002-10-27 23:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-29 18:04 ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 22:09 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-31 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 10:59 ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 7:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-10-31 9:12 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-01 9:40 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-01 13:06 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-03 13:57 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:19 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:15 ` Dave Love
2002-11-12 13:18 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-14 4:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47 ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:42 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:37 ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 19:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-31 17:27 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:10 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:33 ` Dave Love
2002-11-07 4:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 10:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 12:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 11:58 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-13 11:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:49 ` Dave Love
2002-11-11 20:25 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:56 ` Dave Love
2002-11-18 19:09 ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-11-20 17:10 ` Dave Love
2002-11-21 17:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 18:57 ` Dave Love
2002-11-25 12:36 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 23:38 ` Dave Love
2002-11-29 15:04 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 19:57 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01 9:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:02 ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-09 19:03 ` Dave Love
2002-12-12 17:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-15 17:23 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01 9:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:05 ` Dave Love
2002-12-02 15:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-06 16:41 ` movemail re-write [was Re: TODO additions] Dave Love
[not found] ` <E18LD0N-0004Rc-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
2002-12-10 23:42 ` Dave Love
2002-12-16 10:49 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-17 18:44 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-18 9:35 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-19 18:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 15:47 ` TODO additions Richard Stallman
2002-12-03 10:58 ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:04 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 15:13 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-28 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-28 5:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-29 15:03 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:59 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-30 14:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 4:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:19 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=E18DrH4-0001zs-00@fencepost.gnu.org \
--to=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
--cc=schwab@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).