From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Richard Stallman Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: TODO additions Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:34 -0500 Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <200210291902.g9TJ2AY18220@rum.cs.yale.edu> Reply-To: rms@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1037648428 11088 80.91.224.249 (18 Nov 2002 19:40:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 19:40:28 +0000 (UTC) Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18Drkv-0002sX-00 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:40:25 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18DrnH-0007gQ-00 for ; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 20:42:51 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18Driw-0002Rl-00; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:38:22 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18DrHH-0006xu-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:47 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10) id 18DrHB-0006sS-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:45 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 18DrHA-0006s0-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:40 -0500 Original-Received: from rms by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.10) id 18DrH4-0001zs-00; Mon, 18 Nov 2002 14:09:34 -0500 Original-To: d.love@dl.ac.uk In-reply-to: (message from Dave Love on 17 Nov 2002 22:56:31 +0000) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.11 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:9525 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:9525 > At first it was always done that way. > Later on some systems we arranged to use cc. So we added the > ORDINARY_LINK flag for those systems. So if I understand correctly, ORDINARY_LINK just means use `$(CC)' for what would normally be the Makefile LINK variable. Yes. /* GNU libc requires ORDINARY_LINK so that its own crt0 is used. Linux is an exception because it uses a funny variant of GNU libc. */ I don't know about the first sentence, but I think the second isn't true on modern systems, Could you explain at greater length how it is not true? and it's not clear whether it would be an advantage if the gnu-linux configuration was be changed for configurations using libc6. I don't understand--what change are you contemplating?