unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
Cc: schwab@suse.de, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TODO additions
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 06:32:40 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E18BvlA-0002hS-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <rzqel9rdfbw.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk> (message from Dave Love on 11 Nov 2002 20:25:07 +0000)

    > ORDINARY_LINK is one of those symbols.  Right now it is defined in
    > certain *.h files.  Part of this proposal is that Autoconf should
    > define it directly.

    What proposal?  I haven't said that, at least.

Someone proposed to eliminate the *.h files and determine the
information with Autoconf.  That means either defining ORDINARY_LINK
with Autoconf or eliminating it entirely.

If nobody is advocating that now, then there is no need to argue about
it.

    [Why would Emacs need to be linked differently from any other program?

I don't know "Why would it?" but I can answer the question "Why does
it?"  Emacs needed to use its own special crt0.o file and that
required calling ld directly.  At first it was always done that way.
Later on some systems we arranged to use cc.  So we added the
ORDINARY_LINK flag for those systems.

The question is relevant if you are thinking of implementing a
replacement for this code, which would always use cc to link.  I think
that would be a nice simplification if it works, but hard to do.

Unless and until that change is made, we need to keep supporting the
use of ORDINARY_LINK, which means that one way or another configure.in
must decide the value of ORDINARY_LINK.

  reply	other threads:[~2002-11-13 11:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-10-18 12:41 TODO additions Dave Love
2002-10-19  3:24 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-21 13:11   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 16:47   ` Dave Love
2002-10-21 13:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-21 13:21   ` Oliver Scholz
2002-10-22 14:14     ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 17:03   ` Dave Love
2002-10-27 23:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-29 18:04   ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 22:09     ` Miles Bader
2002-10-31 17:25       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 10:59       ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31  7:21       ` Kai Großjohann
2002-10-31  9:12         ` Miles Bader
2002-11-01  9:40         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-01 13:06           ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-03 13:57             ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:19       ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:32         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:15           ` Dave Love
2002-11-12 13:18             ` Miles Bader
2002-11-14  4:10               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47               ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:42       ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:31         ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:37           ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 19:02   ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-31 17:27     ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:10     ` Dave Love
2002-11-02  3:31       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:33         ` Dave Love
2002-11-07  4:48           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 10:33             ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 12:06               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 11:58                 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-13 11:31                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:49                     ` Dave Love
2002-11-11 20:25                 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32                   ` Richard Stallman [this message]
2002-11-17 22:56                     ` Dave Love
2002-11-18 19:09                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-20 17:10                         ` Dave Love
2002-11-21 17:12                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 18:57                             ` Dave Love
2002-11-25 12:36                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 23:38                                 ` Dave Love
2002-11-29 15:04                                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 19:57                                     ` Dave Love
2002-12-01  9:16                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:02                                         ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10                                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-09 19:03                                             ` Dave Love
2002-12-12 17:09                                               ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-15 17:23                                                 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01  9:16                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:05                                         ` Dave Love
2002-12-02 15:47                                       ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-06 16:41                                         ` movemail re-write [was Re: TODO additions] Dave Love
     [not found]                                           ` <E18LD0N-0004Rc-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
2002-12-10 23:42                                             ` Dave Love
2002-12-16 10:49                                           ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-17 18:44                                             ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-18  9:35                                               ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-19 18:32                                                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 15:47                                       ` TODO additions Richard Stallman
2002-12-03 10:58                                         ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10                                           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:04                                   ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 15:13                           ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-28  1:43                             ` Miles Bader
2002-11-28  5:45                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-29 15:03                             ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:59                               ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-30 14:05                                 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07  4:48           ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:19             ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32               ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47                 ` Dave Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E18BvlA-0002hS-00@fencepost.gnu.org \
    --to=rms@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
    --cc=schwab@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).