From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
Cc: d.love@dl.ac.uk, monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: TODO additions
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2002 12:58:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <jeof8wiahk.fsf@sykes.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E18A7uX-0007j6-00@fencepost.gnu.org> (Richard Stallman's message of "Fri, 08 Nov 2002 07:06:53 -0500")
Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
|> |> I think it will be hard to make Autoconf set those symbols. For
|> |> instance, consider the variable ORDINARY_LINK. How would Autoconf
|> |> determine that? It is possible that all modern systems use
|> |> ORDINARY_LINK and we can eliminate the conditional, but otherwise
|> |> I see no substitute for handling it the way we do now.
|>
|> Instead of letting autoconf determine the right [sm]/*.h file, it just
|> defines the respective symbols instead.
|>
|> Autoconf does not determine which *.h files to use.
|> configure decides that based on the configuration name.
Exactly, that's what I meant.
|> I therefore challenge anyone to show a way that Autoconf can determine
|> the proper value for ORDINARY_LINK. I don't think this is easy.
Based on the configuration name?
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux AG, Deutschherrnstr. 15-19, D-90429 Nürnberg
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-11 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-18 12:41 TODO additions Dave Love
2002-10-19 3:24 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-21 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 16:47 ` Dave Love
2002-10-21 13:07 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-21 13:21 ` Oliver Scholz
2002-10-22 14:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-22 17:03 ` Dave Love
2002-10-27 23:38 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-29 18:04 ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 22:09 ` Miles Bader
2002-10-31 17:25 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 10:59 ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 7:21 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-10-31 9:12 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-01 9:40 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-01 13:06 ` Kai Großjohann
2002-11-03 13:57 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:19 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:15 ` Dave Love
2002-11-12 13:18 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-14 4:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47 ` Dave Love
2002-10-30 17:18 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:42 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:37 ` Dave Love
2002-10-29 19:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2002-10-31 17:27 ` Richard Stallman
2002-10-31 18:10 ` Dave Love
2002-11-02 3:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-05 11:33 ` Dave Love
2002-11-07 4:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 10:33 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-11-08 12:06 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 11:58 ` Andreas Schwab [this message]
2002-11-13 11:31 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:49 ` Dave Love
2002-11-11 20:25 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:56 ` Dave Love
2002-11-18 19:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-20 17:10 ` Dave Love
2002-11-21 17:12 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-24 18:57 ` Dave Love
2002-11-25 12:36 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 23:38 ` Dave Love
2002-11-29 15:04 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 19:57 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01 9:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:02 ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-09 19:03 ` Dave Love
2002-12-12 17:09 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-15 17:23 ` Dave Love
2002-12-01 9:16 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 14:05 ` Dave Love
2002-12-02 15:47 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-06 16:41 ` movemail re-write [was Re: TODO additions] Dave Love
[not found] ` <E18LD0N-0004Rc-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
2002-12-10 23:42 ` Dave Love
2002-12-16 10:49 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-17 18:44 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-18 9:35 ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2002-12-19 18:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-12-02 15:47 ` TODO additions Richard Stallman
2002-12-03 10:58 ` Dave Love
2002-12-05 15:10 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:04 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-27 15:13 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-28 1:43 ` Miles Bader
2002-11-28 5:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-11-29 15:03 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-29 15:59 ` Francesco Potorti`
2002-11-30 14:05 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-07 4:48 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-11 20:19 ` Dave Love
2002-11-13 11:32 ` Richard Stallman
2002-11-17 22:47 ` Dave Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=jeof8wiahk.fsf@sykes.suse.de \
--to=schwab@suse.de \
--cc=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier+gnu/emacs@rum.cs.yale.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).