From: "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com, teirllm@dms.auburn.edu, rms@gnu.org,
emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Changing the no-toolkit scrollbar thumb color. (minor issue)
Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2003 09:23:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <C0304600-F704-11D7-BEAF-00039363E640@swipnet.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031005002529.GC23295@fencepost>
>> One of the reasons to have GTK in the first place is to get a
>> consistent
>> look-and-feel with other GTK/Gnome applications (granted Emacs uses
>> different icons). If customizations are needed, we can recommend
>> another
>> toolkit.
>
> That's completely absurd.
>
> Perhaps the main goal of adding GTK support for you was `consistency,'
> which
> is admirable, but please don't repeat the mistakes of the Gnome
> project by
> deciding that `consistency' is so overarching a goal that it ought to
> trump
> all others.
No, not the main goal, but one goal. I like customizations, I think
Xt got that part right with X resources. In an ideal world, I would
have liked GTK to have something similar. But I see where Gnome/GTK
is headed, Gnome 1.4 is more customizable than 2.4. Sawfish (the
default WM in 1.4) is more customizable than Metacity (default WM in
2.4). Gnome is relying more and more on Gconf, the file based
customizations may be removed. It has been stated that the first
priority for GTK is to make Gnome work. It may also come to a point
where Gnome is needed for GTK apps. Already bug reports on GTK
has been answered with "use this and that feature in Gnome".
I don't run Gnome, so I use the current customizations for GTK Emacs.
But shall we go against the direction GTK/Gnome is headed for? Or just
accept the fact that GTK/Gnome has a different agenda an adopt to it?
> Anyway, my main point is: document, don't enforce.
This is a good advice, but I don't like things that sometimes
works and sometimes don't based on different surroundings (i.e. themes).
>
> I apologize if any of the above seems obnoxious; I'm very grateful for
> the
> work you've done in adding GTK support to emacs.
Actually, I think we agree on what kind of customization we want. The
question is, can we get it?
Jan D.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-05 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-26 20:13 Changing the no-toolkit scrollbar thumb color. (minor issue) Rob Browning
2003-09-26 21:23 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-26 21:32 ` Rob Browning
2003-09-27 18:16 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-27 21:55 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-28 13:08 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-28 16:38 ` Jan D.
2003-09-28 21:17 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-29 16:01 ` Jan D.
2003-09-29 19:05 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-29 19:23 ` Jan D.
2003-09-28 16:42 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-28 18:01 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-28 21:38 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-28 23:47 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-29 0:52 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-29 1:30 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-29 11:58 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-30 12:22 ` Richard Stallman
2003-09-29 19:31 ` Richard Stallman
2003-09-30 0:11 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-30 13:55 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-09-30 14:25 ` Miles Bader
2003-09-30 15:16 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-10-04 18:29 ` Jan D.
2003-09-30 20:25 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-04 18:36 ` Jan D.
2003-10-05 3:24 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-05 17:56 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-05 18:12 ` Jan D.
2003-10-05 18:27 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-05 19:16 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-05 20:57 ` Jan D.
2003-10-05 22:09 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-06 0:14 ` Miles Bader
2003-10-06 2:22 ` Miles Bader
2003-10-06 4:15 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-06 4:34 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-10-12 15:04 ` Jan D.
2003-09-30 0:27 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-30 20:24 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-01 0:35 ` Danilo Segan
2003-10-04 0:35 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-10-04 18:55 ` Jan D.
2003-10-04 18:43 ` Jan D.
2003-10-04 19:35 ` Danilo Segan
2003-10-04 18:11 ` Jan D.
2003-10-05 0:25 ` Miles Bader
2003-10-05 7:23 ` Jan D. [this message]
2003-10-05 7:59 ` Miles Bader
2003-09-28 21:25 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-28 17:37 ` Luc Teirlinck
2003-09-28 21:33 ` Robert J. Chassell
2003-09-28 22:03 ` Luc Teirlinck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=C0304600-F704-11D7-BEAF-00039363E640@swipnet.se \
--to=jan.h.d@swipnet.se \
--cc=bob@rattlesnake.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
--cc=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).