unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist.
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 23:05:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wtqy4gvv.fsf@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85ll7e68ei.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 19 Apr 2005 18:25:25 +0200")

David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:

> Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl> writes:
>
>> unload-feature removes functions it is unloading from hooks.  What
>> about removing these functions from auto-mode-alist as well?

[...]

> Actually, _both_ sound like a spectacularly bad idea if the unloaded
> function gets replaced by a restored autoload.  I don't know the code
> well enough.

Good point.

I don't thinks it's that simple, though.  The idea of (unload-feature
x) is to undo the changes introduced by feature x.  If feature x puts
a function on a hook or in auto-mode-alist, then unload-feature should
remove it; even if that function is replaced by a restored autoload.
Unfortunately, there is no way to tell how that function got on a hook
or in auto-mode-alist.

I guess it can't hurt to leave a function on a hook or in
auto-mode-alist if it is replaced by a restored autoload. (Even if
feature x actually put it there.)  See patch below.  Erring on the
other side seems more damaging: removing a function from a hook when
that function was put there by a user's init file or something.

What do others think?

Lute.


Index: lisp/loadhist.el
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/emacs/emacs/lisp/loadhist.el,v
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -C2 -r1.32 loadhist.el
*** lisp/loadhist.el	19 Apr 2005 15:08:05 -0000	1.32
--- lisp/loadhist.el	19 Apr 2005 20:27:30 -0000
***************
*** 189,194 ****
  			(memq x unload-feature-special-hooks)))	; Known abnormal hooks etc.
  	   (dolist (y unload-hook-features-list)
! 	     (when (eq (car-safe y) 'defun)
! 	       (remove-hook x (cdr y))))))))
      (when (fboundp 'elp-restore-function) ; remove ELP stuff first
        (dolist (elt unload-hook-features-list)
--- 189,201 ----
  			(memq x unload-feature-special-hooks)))	; Known abnormal hooks etc.
  	   (dolist (y unload-hook-features-list)
! 	     (when (and (eq (car-safe y) 'defun)
! 			(not (get (cdr y) 'autoload)))
! 	       (remove-hook x (cdr y)))))))
!       ;; Remove any feature-symbols from auto-mode-alist as well.
!       (dolist (y unload-hook-features-list)
! 	(when (and (eq (car-safe y) 'defun)
! 		   (not (get (cdr y) 'autoload)))
! 	  (setq auto-mode-alist
! 		(rassq-delete-all (cdr y) auto-mode-alist)))))
      (when (fboundp 'elp-restore-function) ; remove ELP stuff first
        (dolist (elt unload-hook-features-list)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-19 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-19 15:23 Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 16:25 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 17:44   ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 21:28     ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 21:58       ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 22:33         ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:52           ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-24 20:24             ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 20:50               ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 21:51                 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 22:00                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 23:37                     ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-25  0:07                       ` David Kastrup
2005-04-26 10:04                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 19:22           ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:01         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 23:14         ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:24           ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:41             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:00               ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 19:18                 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:50                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 19:29               ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-20 14:57           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 15:59             ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-21 15:30               ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 16:35                 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-22 20:51                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 21:00                     ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-23 22:10                       ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 20:21                         ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 20:32                           ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 20:52                             ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-25 16:05                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-23 22:24                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 14:57         ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 15:02           ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 15:57             ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:37               ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:19                 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 20:11                   ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 20:25                     ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 20:57                       ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 21:33                         ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 16:25             ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-20 16:57               ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 22:47                 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-20 22:58                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21  9:56                     ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-21 10:12                       ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21 11:50                         ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-21 19:56                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 20:13                           ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-23 16:23                               ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 11:41                       ` Johan Vromans
2005-04-20 15:43           ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21 15:30             ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 17:46               ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-19 22:00       ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:22       ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-19 23:33         ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 21:05   ` Lute Kamstra [this message]
2005-04-20 14:57     ` Richard Stallman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87wtqy4gvv.fsf@xs4all.nl \
    --to=lute.kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).