From: Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist.
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 23:00:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oec5p5rq.fsf@xs4all.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <857jiucz6r.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Fri, 22 Apr 2005 22:51:40 +0200")
David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> writes:
> Lute Kamstra <Lute.Kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl> writes:
>
>> Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>> Is there a reason why Fload can't do like do_autoload and use the
>>> information recorded in Vautoload_queue to set the autoload property
>>> of function symbols?
>>>
>>> Maybe it could work.
>>>
>>> I think it would be better not to try changing this now.
>>
>> Agreed; changing this would be tricky. I'll put it on my post-release
>> todo list. ;-)
>
> I have thought about it somewhat. I have come to the opinion that it
> is a bad idea if load-file does this sort of recording since load-file
> is often used equivalently to eval-buffer and similar things.
>
> The function that _clearly_ should trigger/use the recorded
> information, however, is "require".
Agreed.
> I don't think we need to make (load "filename") (unload-feature
>'filename) do anything sensible (and indeed it is legal to load the
>same file several times in succession), but it seems desirable to
>have (require 'filename) (unload-feature 'filename) form a proper
>pair.
I'm not sure if it's the best solution not to let (load "filename")
record autoloads. But letting only (require 'filename) record
autoloads would be a big improvement. My guess is that the vast
majority of files get loaded by do_autoload and Frequire.
Furthermore, it seems quite easy to implement the recording of
autoloads in Frequire. I'll give it a try and experiment with it for
a while...
> Unfortunately, this does not work well with the site-lisp.el construct
> (mapc 'load-file (directory-files "site-start.d" t ".el\\'"))
>
> So a better expedient would be to have
> (provide 'xxx)
>
> turn on the necessary action at the end of the current load file in
> case that the feature is provided the first time.
>
> This should be a pretty reliable way to do the recordings for files
> that are connected with a "feature".
I'm not familiar with this. Could you elaborate?
When is this used? Does it load files that define functions that
replace autoloads?
Lute.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-23 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-19 15:23 Removing unloaded functions from auto-mode-alist Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 16:25 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 17:44 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 21:28 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 21:58 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 22:33 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-24 20:24 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 20:50 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 21:51 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 22:00 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 23:37 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-25 0:07 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-26 10:04 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 19:22 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-19 23:14 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:24 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:41 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:00 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 19:18 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:50 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 19:29 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-20 14:57 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 15:59 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-21 15:30 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 16:35 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-22 20:51 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 21:00 ` Lute Kamstra [this message]
2005-04-23 22:10 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 20:21 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-24 20:32 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-24 20:52 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-25 16:05 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-23 22:24 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 14:57 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-20 15:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 15:57 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 18:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 19:19 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 20:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 20:25 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 20:57 ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-20 21:33 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 16:25 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-20 16:57 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-20 22:47 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-20 22:58 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21 9:56 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-21 10:12 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21 11:50 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-21 19:56 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 20:13 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-23 16:23 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 11:41 ` Johan Vromans
2005-04-20 15:43 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-21 15:30 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-21 17:46 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-23 16:15 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-19 22:00 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-19 23:22 ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-19 23:33 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-19 21:05 ` Lute Kamstra
2005-04-20 14:57 ` Richard Stallman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oec5p5rq.fsf@xs4all.nl \
--to=lute.kamstra.lists@xs4all.nl \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=rms@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).