unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
To: "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@siege-engine.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Jorgen Schaefer <forcer@forcix.cx>
Subject: Re: A unified project root interface
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 21:03:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87txngzvyb.fsf@engster.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <516057D5.6060208@siege-engine.com> (Eric M. Ludlam's message of "Sat, 06 Apr 2013 13:13:57 -0400")

Eric M. Ludlam writes:
> On 04/06/2013 09:25 AM, Jorgen Schaefer wrote:
>> On Sun, 24 Mar 2013 11:13:10 +0100
>> Jorgen Schaefer<forcer@forcix.cx>  wrote:
>>
>
>>> I did a quick implementation of my current ideas on the topic:
>>>
>>> https://raw.github.com/jorgenschaefer/project-el/master/project.el
>>>
>>> Quick run-down:
>>>
>>> - If you only want to know the project root, you call (project-root)
>>>    and never have to worry about anything else.
>>> - This will call functions in `project-guess-root-functions' until one
>>>    returns a non-nil value. This value is cached for future calls.
>>> - The default functions use the current EDE project if any, or VC
>>>    directory markers, or ask the user; can be extended as needed.
>>> - When an extension provides a way to change the project root, they
>>>    can call `project-set-root', which will run
>>>    `project-root-changed-hook' so that other extensions (e.g. EDE) can
>>>    intercept that and adjust themselves accordingly. Or even throw an
>>>    error.
>>>
>>> Other extensions should be able to build on that.
>>
>> As the discussion died down: What would be the next step here?
>
> I am probably too close to EDE to be very helpful in solving the wider
> problem, but I can offer a branch in the CEDET repository as a testing
> ground so that any changes needed in EDE can be easily made and tested
> in our test suites.
>
> We can remove it from CEDET for maintenance elsewhere once the initial
> development is done.  We can keep new tests around in CEDET to make
> sure EDE stays compatible.

I don't think there are any changes necessary in EDE. All Jorgen's code
does is to determine the project's root directory for the current file,
and EDE is one possibility to provide this information, among others.

I don't have a problem with this approach, besides a small hunch that
soon people will add more features to 'project-root', and one day it may
look a bit like EDE. Unsurprisingly, I still think for general project
definitions EDE is the right choice.

-David



  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-09 16:44 A unified project root interface Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-09 17:12 ` Fabian Ezequiel Gallina
2013-03-10  5:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-10 10:06   ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-11 18:57   ` Lluís
2013-03-12 23:28     ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-12 23:42       ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-13  2:02         ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-13 18:03       ` David Engster
2013-03-13 19:11         ` Sudish Joseph
2013-03-16  0:47         ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-16 14:18           ` David Engster
2013-03-16 15:02             ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-16 22:27               ` Phil Hagelberg
2013-03-16 22:59               ` David Engster
2013-03-16 23:16                 ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-17 17:40                   ` David Engster
2013-03-17 18:18                     ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-18 22:50                       ` David Engster
2013-03-19  1:57                         ` John Yates
2013-03-19  7:18                           ` David Engster
2013-03-19 12:23                             ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-19 13:06                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-19 19:09                               ` David Engster
2013-03-20  3:21                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20  4:48                                   ` Leo Liu
2013-03-20  7:04                                     ` joakim
2013-03-20  7:05                                     ` David Engster
2013-03-20  7:13                                   ` David Engster
2013-03-20 12:57                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 16:14                                       ` Davis Herring
2013-03-20 17:41                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 17:48                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 18:20                                         ` Bruce Korb
2013-03-20 22:14                                           ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 16:34                                       ` David Engster
2013-03-20 17:47                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-21  0:55                                           ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-21  3:27                                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-21  4:07                                               ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-21 14:33                                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-22  2:12                                                 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-23 11:04                                                   ` EIEIO split (was: A unified project root interface) David Engster
2013-03-21 16:32                                             ` A unified project root interface David Engster
2013-03-22  0:47                                               ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-22 20:30                                                 ` David Engster
2013-03-23 17:10                                                   ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-23 17:26                                                     ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-23 18:02                                                       ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-23 20:51                                                         ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2013-03-24  4:25                                                           ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-24 10:13                                                             ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-04-06 13:25                                                               ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-04-06 17:13                                                                 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-04-08 19:03                                                                   ` David Engster [this message]
2013-12-31 20:12                                                               ` Daniel Colascione
2013-03-20 17:49                                         ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-19  7:33                         ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-17  8:08                 ` joakim
2013-03-12 15:34   ` Sudish Joseph
2013-03-12 16:51     ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-12 18:23   ` Ted Zlatanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87txngzvyb.fsf@engster.org \
    --to=deng@randomsample.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=eric@siege-engine.com \
    --cc=forcer@forcix.cx \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).