unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: Jorgen Schaefer <forcer@forcix.cx>,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org, "Eric M. Ludlam" <eric@siege-engine.com>,
	John Yates <john@yates-sheets.org>
Subject: Re: A unified project root interface
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 08:13:24 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ng6tugb.fsf@engster.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvd2uu4v53.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 19 Mar 2013 23:21:54 -0400")

Stefan Monnier writes:
>>>>> I took the sense of the OP to be that the concept of a project-root
>>>>> deserved to become part of the core set of emacs concepts unrelated to
>>>>> optional packages e.g. much as file and directory local variables.
>
>>>>> Once the concept gets pulled into the core extension author simply
>>>>> assume existence of project-root functionality without needing to have
>>>>> to enable in any particular way.
>>>> OK, if this is something which should be available with emacs -Q right
>>>> at startup, then EDE is out.  It indeed is too big for that.
>>> It should be possible to write the code such that the project-root part
>>> of EDE doesn't require loading too much code.
>> Yes, but no matter how small, EDE depends on EIEIO, so this would mean
>> that EIEIO is loaded right at startup.  I thought this would be
>> considered a showstopper, even when we clean up its namespace use.
>
> Right, preloading EIEIO is not what I was planning to do, indeed.
> IOW, I think the challenge is to extract the "project-root" part of EDE
> in such a way that it doesn't require preloading as much code.
> That might require splitting EIEIO, or some other approach, maybe,
> I don't know.

I don't think that's a practical approach. In EDE, a project *is* a
class.

I would however like to ask if such a 'project-root' feature is
absolutely needed right at startup time. I'm not sure about the overhead
involved when loading files, which might be annoying to people who don't
need it. OTOH, we already have vc-find-file-hook enabled by default,
which I guess renders such questions moot...

BTW, I was wondering if the vc package couldn't just provide the current
root; it felt kind of silly to implement scanning for vcs markers, when
'vc' actually already did that. This way, we could implement a
'project-root' function, which first checks if there's an EDE project,
and if not, it could return the root directory from 'vc' if the current
file is under version control.

-David



  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-20  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-09 16:44 A unified project root interface Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-09 17:12 ` Fabian Ezequiel Gallina
2013-03-10  5:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-10 10:06   ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-11 18:57   ` Lluís
2013-03-12 23:28     ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-12 23:42       ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-13  2:02         ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-13 18:03       ` David Engster
2013-03-13 19:11         ` Sudish Joseph
2013-03-16  0:47         ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-16 14:18           ` David Engster
2013-03-16 15:02             ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-16 22:27               ` Phil Hagelberg
2013-03-16 22:59               ` David Engster
2013-03-16 23:16                 ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-17 17:40                   ` David Engster
2013-03-17 18:18                     ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-18 22:50                       ` David Engster
2013-03-19  1:57                         ` John Yates
2013-03-19  7:18                           ` David Engster
2013-03-19 12:23                             ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-19 13:06                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-19 19:09                               ` David Engster
2013-03-20  3:21                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20  4:48                                   ` Leo Liu
2013-03-20  7:04                                     ` joakim
2013-03-20  7:05                                     ` David Engster
2013-03-20  7:13                                   ` David Engster [this message]
2013-03-20 12:57                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 16:14                                       ` Davis Herring
2013-03-20 17:41                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 17:48                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 18:20                                         ` Bruce Korb
2013-03-20 22:14                                           ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-20 16:34                                       ` David Engster
2013-03-20 17:47                                         ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-21  0:55                                           ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-21  3:27                                             ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-21  4:07                                               ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-21 14:33                                                 ` Stefan Monnier
2013-03-22  2:12                                                 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-23 11:04                                                   ` EIEIO split (was: A unified project root interface) David Engster
2013-03-21 16:32                                             ` A unified project root interface David Engster
2013-03-22  0:47                                               ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-22 20:30                                                 ` David Engster
2013-03-23 17:10                                                   ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-03-23 17:26                                                     ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-23 18:02                                                       ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-23 20:51                                                         ` Pascal J. Bourguignon
2013-03-24  4:25                                                           ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-24 10:13                                                             ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-04-06 13:25                                                               ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-04-06 17:13                                                                 ` Eric M. Ludlam
2013-04-08 19:03                                                                   ` David Engster
2013-12-31 20:12                                                               ` Daniel Colascione
2013-03-20 17:49                                         ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-19  7:33                         ` Jorgen Schaefer
2013-03-17  8:08                 ` joakim
2013-03-12 15:34   ` Sudish Joseph
2013-03-12 16:51     ` Dmitry Gutov
2013-03-12 18:23   ` Ted Zlatanov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=874ng6tugb.fsf@engster.org \
    --to=deng@randomsample.de \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=eric@siege-engine.com \
    --cc=forcer@forcix.cx \
    --cc=john@yates-sheets.org \
    --cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).