unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Luc Teirlinck <teirllm@dms.auburn.edu>
Cc: eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `xterm-mouse-mode' has a bogus Custom group
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2005 10:37:21 -0500 (CDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200504091537.j39FbLE23584@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16983.46770.196469.224088@farnswood.snap.net.nz> (message from Nick Roberts on Sat, 9 Apr 2005 23:04:18 +1200)

Nick Roberts wrote:

   I'm not sure what should be done for customize though. Luc?

I could handle that.  However, I really start to doubt that enabling
xterm-mouse-mode by default in all terminals for which we believe it
makes sense is a good idea.  As we have seen, Xterm Mouse mode has a
very imperfect and unpredictable implementation.  It is basically
impossible to know whether a given type of mouse click is going to be
handled by Emacs or by the terminal without trying it out first (or
very carefully studying the code first).  That is why the Emacs manual
would have to tell people who get frustrated by all of this
unpredictability how to disable the mode.  Also the heuristic we use
to decide when to enable xterm-mouse-mode might miss some terminal
types for which it works.  People using these terminals would still
have to know which function or variable to use to enable it themselves.

I would say, let us keep the mode disabled by default.  If we want to
go through with enabling it by default, I will take care of the Custom
problems.

Sincerely,

Luc.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-09 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-02  3:51 `xterm-mouse-mode' has a bogus Custom group Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-02  5:30 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-02 13:46   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-05  6:25     ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-06  0:00       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-06  0:17         ` David Kastrup
2005-04-06 23:01           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06 23:22             ` David Kastrup
2005-04-07  8:44               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-07  9:21                 ` Han Boetes
2005-04-07  9:29                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08  3:22                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-07  9:30                 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-08  3:22               ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-08  8:13                 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-06  2:59         ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-07  0:45           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08  1:50             ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08  1:59               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08  2:13                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08 15:14                   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-08  2:22                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08 14:32               ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-08 16:05                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08 21:54                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09  0:28                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-09  4:06                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-09  5:22                       ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09  7:53                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-09 11:04                           ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09 15:37                             ` Luc Teirlinck [this message]
2005-04-09 22:21                               ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-10  1:54                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10  1:54                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10  4:54                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-10 13:18                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-10 14:37                             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-10 15:29                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-10 21:51                               ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-10 23:30                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  5:02                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13 10:21                                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-11  1:56                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-12  1:04                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12  1:28                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 17:25                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13  1:24                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  4:58                                     ` Jan D.
2005-04-13  5:28                                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-14  2:16                                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-14  4:06                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-14  7:40                                           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-15  2:04                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-15  8:23                                               ` Miles Bader
2005-04-15  8:47                                                 ` Ismail Donmez
2005-04-15  8:47                                               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-15  9:07                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-16  1:06                                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-14 19:03                                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-15  2:11                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  5:21                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-12  2:12                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12  2:47                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 17:23                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13  0:01                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 23:31                                     ` David Kastrup
2005-04-13  1:49                                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  2:17                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-13 18:31                                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10 14:27                         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-11  1:56                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06  3:02       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06  8:22         ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200504091537.j39FbLE23584@raven.dms.auburn.edu \
    --to=teirllm@dms.auburn.edu \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).