unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: `xterm-mouse-mode' has a bogus Custom group
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 08:28:19 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01c53fe9$Blat.v2.4$bf59f240@zahav.net.il> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15947f67f74b05170937dfdb4aa7c27f@swipnet.se> (jan.h.d@swipnet.se)

> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eliz@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org
> From: "Jan D." <jan.h.d@swipnet.se>
> Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 06:58:04 +0200
> 
> > But how do you check whether configure was invoked with `--without-x'
> > from Lisp and from C?
> 
> #ifndef HAVE_X_WINDOWS

Actually, I'd suggest

 #ifdef HAVE_WINDOW_SYSTEM

because the latter will catch non-X windowed versions (e.g.,
MS-Windows) as well.  Unless the code is in X-specific file, like
xfns.c, where non-X toolkits are a non-issue.

> You can check window-system in Lisp (it is nil), but it doesn't tell if 
> the running Emacs was configured with --without-x, only that it is 
> currently running without X.  I.e. it could be emacs -nw, or simply 
> running without an X display.  Does it make any difference?

Yes, it makes a difference: Emacs compiled with --without-x cannot
invoke code that calls X-specific primitives, because that would
signal errors complaining about void functions.  Emacs that does have
X support but runs with -nw will silently do nothing when such code is
invoked because (modulo bugs) these features are coded to do nothing
when the required graphic display facilities are not available.

  reply	other threads:[~2005-04-13  5:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-02  3:51 `xterm-mouse-mode' has a bogus Custom group Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-02  5:30 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-02 13:46   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-05  6:25     ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-06  0:00       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-06  0:17         ` David Kastrup
2005-04-06 23:01           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06 23:22             ` David Kastrup
2005-04-07  8:44               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-07  9:21                 ` Han Boetes
2005-04-07  9:29                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08  3:22                   ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-07  9:30                 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-08  3:22               ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-08  8:13                 ` David Kastrup
2005-04-06  2:59         ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-07  0:45           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08  1:50             ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08  1:59               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08  2:13                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08 15:14                   ` Andreas Schwab
2005-04-08  2:22                 ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-08 14:32               ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-08 16:05                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-08 21:54                   ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09  0:28                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-09  4:06                     ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-09  5:22                       ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09  7:53                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-09 11:04                           ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-09 15:37                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-09 22:21                               ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-10  1:54                         ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10  1:54                       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10  4:54                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-10 13:18                           ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-10 14:37                             ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-10 15:29                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-10 21:51                               ` Nick Roberts
2005-04-10 23:30                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  5:02                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13 10:21                                   ` David Kastrup
2005-04-11  1:56                             ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-12  1:04                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12  1:28                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 17:25                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13  1:24                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  4:58                                     ` Jan D.
2005-04-13  5:28                                       ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2005-04-14  2:16                                         ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-14  4:06                                           ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-14  7:40                                           ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-15  2:04                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-15  8:23                                               ` Miles Bader
2005-04-15  8:47                                                 ` Ismail Donmez
2005-04-15  8:47                                               ` Kim F. Storm
2005-04-15  9:07                                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-16  1:06                                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-14 19:03                                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-15  2:11                                             ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  5:21                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2005-04-12  2:12                               ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12  2:47                                 ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 17:23                                 ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-13  0:01                                   ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-12 23:31                                     ` David Kastrup
2005-04-13  1:49                                       ` Luc Teirlinck
2005-04-13  2:17                                     ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-13 18:31                                     ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-10 14:27                         ` Stefan Monnier
2005-04-11  1:56                           ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06  3:02       ` Richard Stallman
2005-04-06  8:22         ` David Kastrup

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='01c53fe9$Blat.v2.4$bf59f240@zahav.net.il' \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).