From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, jas@extundo.com
Subject: Re: eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 16:33:15 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200311180733.QAA13703@etlken.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwvhe12emr3.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca> (message from Stefan Monnier on 17 Nov 2003 16:17:56 -0500)
In article <jwvhe12emr3.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>, Stefan Monnier <monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA> writes:
>> The basic problem is that we don't distinguish a character
>> (code) and a number. So, we introduce a character object
> That's one way to look at the problem.
> Another is to say that the problem is instead that we do not distinguish
> between arrays of chars and arrays of bytes.
I agree that it's possible to grasp the problem in that way,
but I'm not sure which is the better way. Could you explain
WHY yours is better?
[...]
> In Emacs-21 we worked around the problem by arranging for "the
> eight-bit-char that encodes to 192" to be represented by the integer 192, so
> as to avoid having to choose. But with unicode, the 128-255 zone cannot be
> dedicated to eight-bit-char since it's already used up for latin-1, so we
> have to face the problem more directly.
> The places where Emacs-21 still had to choose, we just used heursitics,
> so `concat' will sometimes return a unibyte string, and sometimes
> multibyte string.
> So I think your options 1-3 are better than 4. BTW, your function
> `eight-bit-char' should be named `byte-to-char' instead.
> Which of 1 to 3 is the best is not clear, and maybe we can just live with
> `make-string-unibyte' and `make-string-multibyte'.
I think you mean string-make-unibyte/multibyte, but, for the
current problem, we can't use it because string-make-unibyte
may behave differently in different language environment.
Such a lang. env. that makes iso-8859-1 or Unicode the
highest priority for the character `À' is ok.
(string-make-unibyte (concat '(?a 192))) = "a\300"
But, if some lang. env. prefers such a charset for `À' that
encodes it not to 192 (e.g. Vietnamese VSCII), we fail.
> Note that 1-3 are not mutually exclusive so we can use
> them all.
Yes, but, at least, I really want to avoid "(3) Make a
series of new functions".
---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@m17n.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-18 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-12 16:11 BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-13 1:53 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-13 4:14 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-13 5:34 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-13 5:50 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-13 4:49 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-13 6:10 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-13 6:51 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-13 9:01 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-13 13:29 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Oliver Scholz
2003-11-13 23:40 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-14 13:35 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Oliver Scholz
2003-11-13 16:34 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-14 0:47 ` eight-bit char handling in emacs-unicode Kenichi Handa
2003-11-14 13:25 ` Oliver Scholz
2003-11-15 1:09 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-15 10:26 ` Oliver Scholz
2003-11-15 21:47 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-11-15 3:04 ` Simon Josefsson
2003-11-16 15:03 ` Alex Schroeder
2003-11-17 21:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-18 7:33 ` Kenichi Handa [this message]
2003-11-18 17:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-19 0:06 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-19 3:05 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-19 10:46 ` Juri Linkov
2003-11-19 13:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-20 23:41 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-21 0:41 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-21 5:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-21 6:27 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-21 14:59 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-22 1:25 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-22 23:53 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-23 7:30 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-23 23:48 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-25 1:07 ` Kenichi Handa
[not found] ` <jwvfzgcsbuv.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
2003-11-26 0:07 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-26 14:14 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-27 1:34 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-11-27 14:23 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-12-01 0:43 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-12-01 16:15 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-12-02 13:07 ` Kenichi Handa
2003-12-02 16:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2003-11-25 4:28 ` Richard Stallman
[not found] ` <jwv7k1gtswz.fsf-monnier+emacs/devel@vor.iro.umontreal.ca>
2003-12-09 21:49 ` Richard Stallman
2003-11-15 22:32 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-17 1:12 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Kenichi Handa
2003-11-17 2:06 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-17 5:45 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Eli Zaretskii
2003-11-17 7:43 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-18 7:01 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Richard Stallman
2003-11-18 8:56 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-19 5:15 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Richard Stallman
2003-11-20 5:48 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
2003-11-20 5:56 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Eli Zaretskii
2003-11-20 6:20 ` BIG5-HKSCS? Simon Josefsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200311180733.QAA13703@etlken.m17n.org \
--to=handa@m17n.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=jas@extundo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).