unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Kenichi Handa <handa@m17n.org>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, d.love@dl.ac.uk, jasonr@f2s.com, pogonyshev@gmx.net
Subject: Re: windows-1251 language environment
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2003 19:40:12 +0900 (JST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310081040.TAA15162@etlken.m17n.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1A76I5-0002tC-Rk@fencepost.gnu.org> (message from Richard Stallman on Wed, 08 Oct 2003 00:51:13 -0400)

In article <E1A76I5-0002tC-Rk@fencepost.gnu.org>, Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes:

> Inheritance of language environments could be a useful idea,
> but I am not sure how much it would save.  Consider this one:
[...]
> We could make it shorter using inheritance, but it is already pretty
> short; is it really worth while making it any shorter?

The purpose of inheritance is not only to make it shorter.
With inheritance, users can make a new lang. env. easily by
inheriting the one that matches best to his purpose.

Another way is to make a new lang. env. by copying an
existing one.

With inheritance, the change to parent affects lang. envs
inheritting it.  With copying, no.  So, purhaps both method
is useful (as well as the case of face).

---
Ken'ichi HANDA
handa@m17n.org

  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-08 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.878.1064866468.21628.bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org>
     [not found] ` <200310032356.54476.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
     [not found]   ` <rzq1xtrsdrm.fsf@albion.dl.ac.uk>
     [not found]     ` <200310060013.52049.pogonyshev@gmx.net>
2003-10-07  2:54       ` windows-1251 language environment Kenichi Handa
2003-10-07 11:56         ` Anton Zinoviev
2003-10-12 15:45           ` Dave Love
2003-10-17 12:49             ` Anton Zinoviev
2003-10-17 13:22               ` Terje Rosten
2003-10-17 14:36                 ` Anton Zinoviev
2003-10-17 16:58                   ` Terje Rosten
2003-10-21 22:38               ` Dave Love
2003-10-23  9:23                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-24 17:07                 ` Anton Zinoviev
2003-10-08  4:51         ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-08 10:40           ` Kenichi Handa [this message]
2003-10-09 14:44             ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-12 15:40               ` Dave Love
2003-10-13 23:50               ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-14 19:31                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-15 13:44                   ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-15 14:55                     ` Stefan Monnier
2003-10-16  9:16                       ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-10-16 16:44                         ` Stefan Monnier
2003-10-17  6:10                           ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2003-10-21 22:48                           ` Dave Love
2003-10-20 19:47                       ` Dave Love
2003-10-16 14:06                     ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-28  8:51                       ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-10 17:11         ` Dave Love
2003-10-10 17:42           ` Stefan Monnier
2003-10-12 17:21             ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-14 22:24               ` Dave Love
2003-10-15 20:00                 ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-20 19:50                   ` Dave Love
2003-10-22  9:24                     ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-25 16:10                       ` Dave Love
2003-10-26 15:33                         ` Alex Schroeder
2003-10-28  8:50                           ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-27  7:02                         ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-28 12:35                           ` Dave Love
2003-10-29 19:01                             ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-15 22:27                 ` Jason Rumney
2003-10-16 16:16                   ` Kevin Rodgers
2003-10-16 16:38                     ` Jason Rumney
2003-10-14  0:44             ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-14 19:31               ` Richard Stallman
2003-10-14 22:33             ` Dave Love
2003-10-13 12:46           ` Dave Love
2003-10-14  0:37           ` Kenichi Handa
2003-10-15 14:38             ` Dave Love

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200310081040.TAA15162@etlken.m17n.org \
    --to=handa@m17n.org \
    --cc=d.love@dl.ac.uk \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=jasonr@f2s.com \
    --cc=pogonyshev@gmx.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).