From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: mail@daniel-mendler.de
Cc: 47712@debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#47712: 27.1; Provide `string-display-width` function, which takes properties into account, `substring-width`
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:32:56 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a6q33753.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83blaj37yi.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:15:17 +0300)
> Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 17:15:17 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
> Cc: 47712@debbugs.gnu.org
>
> > But for we can still look at the micro benchmark. The `string-width`
> > function is 200 times faster than the `string-pixel-width` function.
>
> And if you reuse the same temp buffer?
My benchmarking indicates that reusing the buffer makes
string-pixel-width only 10 times slower than string-width, i.e. 50
about microseconds per call.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-12 14:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-11 21:16 bug#47712: 27.1; Provide `string-display-width` function, which takes properties into account, `substring-width` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 2:26 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 8:45 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 8:53 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-04-12 9:08 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-13 8:01 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-04-13 12:00 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-13 12:25 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-14 8:50 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-14 10:49 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-14 11:38 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 12:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 12:50 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 13:21 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 13:32 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 13:40 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 14:05 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 14:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 14:32 ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2021-04-12 14:38 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 17:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 17:18 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-13 7:06 ` martin rudalics
2021-04-13 12:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 14:36 ` Daniel Mendler
2021-04-12 17:09 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-04-12 17:13 ` Daniel Mendler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=83a6q33753.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=47712@debbugs.gnu.org \
--cc=mail@daniel-mendler.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).