unofficial mirror of bug-gnu-emacs@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
To: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
Cc: larsi@gnus.org, 56815@debbugs.gnu.org, juri@linkov.net
Subject: bug#56815: 29.0.50; Isearch lazy-highlight highlights too much when truncate-lines is in effect
Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 22:31:22 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <83a68r7m2d.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf6b6a6fd31548b3d6c5@heytings.org> (message from Gregory Heytings on Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:11:10 +0000)

> Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2022 19:11:10 +0000
> From: Gregory Heytings <gregory@heytings.org>
> cc: juri@linkov.net, larsi@gnus.org, 56815@debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > I think posn-at-point is much faster,
> >
> 
> No, it is slower.  On my laptop, with long-line.xml and truncate-lines:
> 
> (benchmark-run 1000 (pos-visible-in-window-p 310000)) takes 4 seconds
> 
> (benchmark-run 1000 (numberp (cadr (posn-at-point 310000)))) takes 6 seconds

Why does it matter how long pos-visible-in-window-p takes when it
cannot tell whether the position is visible?

As for posn-at-point, 6 msec per position is not bad, if we in
addition limit the number of matches by some reasonable number, like
100, say.

Moreover, isearch.el could use some special-purpose algorithm for
looking for visible matches in this case.  For example, as soon as
posn-at-point tells us a match is to the right of the window's right
edge, isearch.el could go to the beginning of the next line and
continue from there, instead of checking all the subsequent matches on
the same line (with a result that is known in advance).  This way, we
will probably have even fewer matches, and the search will be faster,
except for very large values of hscroll.





  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-29 19:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-28 17:29 bug#56815: 29.0.50; Isearch lazy-highlight highlights too much when truncate-lines is in effect Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-28 20:08 ` Juri Linkov
2022-07-29  5:50   ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-29 11:48     ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2022-07-29 18:14       ` Juri Linkov
2022-07-29 18:37         ` Gregory Heytings
2022-07-29 19:02           ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-29 19:11             ` Gregory Heytings
2022-07-29 19:31               ` Eli Zaretskii [this message]
2022-07-29 19:36                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-29 19:52                 ` Gregory Heytings
2022-07-29 19:59                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-29 20:26                     ` Gregory Heytings
2022-07-30  5:35                       ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-07-31 19:40                       ` Juri Linkov
2022-07-31 21:21                         ` Gregory Heytings
2022-08-01 11:51                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-01 18:09                           ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-02  7:31                             ` Gregory Heytings
2022-08-02 11:10                               ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-14 13:53                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-21 16:32                               ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-21 17:06                                 ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-21 19:03                                   ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-21 19:35                                     ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-22  6:48                                       ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-22 11:32                                         ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-23  7:41                                           ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-23 12:11                                             ` Eli Zaretskii
2022-08-23 16:49                                               ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-27 19:52                                                 ` Juri Linkov
2022-08-08 17:20 ` Juri Linkov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=83a68r7m2d.fsf@gnu.org \
    --to=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=56815@debbugs.gnu.org \
    --cc=gregory@heytings.org \
    --cc=juri@linkov.net \
    --cc=larsi@gnus.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).