bug#22049: libreoffice compile error

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:

> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
>> > 
>> > > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> > > Message-Id: <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git.leo@famulari.name>
>> > > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
>> > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
>> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686.
>> > >
>> > > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
>> > >
>> > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch,
>> > > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files.
>> > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
>> > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox
>> > > and patch/testBoxAlgo.
>> > > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase.
>> > 
>> > Cool!
>> > 
>> > I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to
>> > apply it unconditionally.  WDYT?
>> 
>> Sure, I'll send an updated patch.
>
> Attached.
>

[...]

>> > So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option?
>> 
>> 2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without
>> success.

Oops, sorry.  :-)

> From 2f895108a3f476038b82e03645ee7f51e4ee1675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ilmbase: Add patch to fix build on i686.
>
> Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
>
> * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-fix-tests.patch: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[source]: Add patch.

Perfect, thanks again!

Ludo’.