bug#22049: libreoffice compile error

[Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>]

On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:36:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> >> > Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> skribis:
> >> > 
> >> > > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> > > Message-Id: <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git.leo@famulari.name>
> >> > > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> >> > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> >> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686.
> >> > >
> >> > > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
> >> > >
> >> > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch,
> >> > > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files.
> >> > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them.
> >> > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox
> >> > > and patch/testBoxAlgo.
> >> > > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase.
> >> > 
> >> > Cool!
> >> > 
> >> > I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to
> >> > apply it unconditionally.  WDYT?
> >> 
> >> Sure, I'll send an updated patch.
> >
> > Attached.
> >
> 
> [...]
> 
> >> > So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option?
> >> 
> >> 2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without
> >> success.
> 
> Oops, sorry.  :-)
> 
> > From 2f895108a3f476038b82e03645ee7f51e4ee1675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500
> > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ilmbase: Add patch to fix build on i686.
> >
> > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-fix-tests.patch: New file.
> > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
> > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[source]: Add patch.
> 
> Perfect, thanks again!

Pushed as 5e8276dcf4e3a, and closing.

> 
> Ludo’.