From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?=) Subject: bug#22049: libreoffice compile error Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 21:36:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87r3fuoryy.fsf@gnu.org> References: <21c1059e083d3df68b981cb1a83b3a7c@openmailbox.org> <877fl0lugc.fsf@gnu.org> <931b1698a0a6d10913db88e944622dc4@openmailbox.org> <20151130195654.GA32198@jasmine> <87h9gsvhep.fsf@gnu.org> <20160229083540.GA18295@jasmine> <20160229083723.GA18766@jasmine> <878u22pbfr.fsf@gnu.org> <20160301172445.GB6052@jasmine> <20160301180148.GB5055@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50868) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aar3X-0006dI-CG for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:38:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aar3S-0001ew-LH for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:38:07 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aar3S-0001es-I3 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:38:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aar3S-0007fL-B0 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 15:38:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20160301180148.GB5055@jasmine> (Leo Famulari's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2016 13:01:48 -0500") List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Leo Famulari Cc: rennes@openmailbox.org, 22049@debbugs.gnu.org Leo Famulari skribis: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: >> > Leo Famulari skribis: >> >=20 >> > > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20= 01 >> > > Message-Id: >> > > From: Leo Famulari >> > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 >> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686. >> > > >> > > Fixes . >> > > >> > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch, >> > > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files. >> > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them. >> > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/test= Box >> > > and patch/testBoxAlgo. >> > > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase. >> >=20 >> > Cool! >> >=20 >> > I think it=E2=80=99d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file,= and to >> > apply it unconditionally. WDYT? >>=20 >> Sure, I'll send an updated patch. > > Attached. > [...] >> > So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option? >>=20 >> 2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without >> success. Oops, sorry. :-) > From 2f895108a3f476038b82e03645ee7f51e4ee1675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ilmbase: Add patch to fix build on i686. > > Fixes . > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-fix-tests.patch: New file. > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[source]: Add patch. Perfect, thanks again! Ludo=E2=80=99.