Re: [PATCH 1/3] gnu: Add llfuse.

[ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)]

Alex Kost <alezost@gmail.com> skribis:

> Leo Famulari (2015-08-26 20:16 +0300) wrote:

[...]

>> +   (description "Python-LLFUSE is a set of Python bindings for the low level
>> +FUSE API.  It requires at least FUSE 2.8.0 and supports both Python 2.x and
>> +3.x.")
>
> IMHO mentioning a version of fuse is not needed.  And IIUC this package
> provides a python3 library, so I would also remove "supports both …".

+1

>> +   (home-page "https://bitbucket.org/nikratio/python-llfuse/")
>> +   (license lgpl2.0)))
>
> It should be 'lgpl2.0+' as the LICENSE file says "or (at your option)
> any later version".

Yes.  Leo, could you also check a few source file headers to confirm
they either have the “or later” clause, or do not specify any version?

> Also I think it is better to put this package in "python.scm" as it just
> contains some general python library.  But I'm not an expert here, so
> better wait for comments of other people.

Agreed.

> But I would name it 'python-llfuse' and would also add 'python2-llfuse'
> package (bug again: I didn't make a single python package).

Right.  See the convention described at
<https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/manual/html_node/Python-Modules.html>.

Leo, could you send an updated patch?

Thanks,
Ludo’.