[PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[Frederick Muriithi]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 57 bytes --]

Adds a new package definition

-- 
Frederick M. Muriithi

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-gnu-Add-python-alabaster.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1666 bytes --]

From 1434fc30313796624bf2bcd4aac3d159af665dbe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Muriithi Frederick Muriuki <fredmanglis@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:10:04 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-alabaster): New variable
---
 gnu/packages/python.scm | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 53d9c78..365f494 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -12563,3 +12563,30 @@ faster ones are not available.")
      "Python module dedicated to rendering RST (reStructuredText) documents to
  ansi-escaped strings suitable for display in a terminal")
     (license license:expat)))
+
+(define-public python-alabaster
+  (package
+   (name "python-alabaster")
+   (version "0.7.9")
+   (source
+    (origin
+     (method url-fetch)
+     (uri (string-append
+           "https://pypi.python.org/packages/71/c3/70da7d8ac18a4f4c502887bd2549e05745fa40"
+           "3e2cd9d06a8a9910a762bc/alabaster-"
+           version
+           ".tar.gz"))
+     (sha256
+      (base32
+       "027anxzcb951gjlcc43y3rbn9qrw36d16vj9wd2smv5410xx9bs7"))))
+   (build-system python-build-system)
+   (inputs
+    `(("python-pygments" ,python-pygments)))
+   (home-page "https://alabaster.readthedocs.io")
+   (synopsis
+    "Configurable sidebar-enabled Sphinx theme")
+   (description
+    "Alabaster is a visually (c)lean, responsive, configurable theme for the Sphinx
+documentation system")
+   (license (license:non-copyleft
+             "https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE"))))
-- 
2.1.4

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[Danny Milosavljevic]

Hi,

On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:12:47 +0300
Frederick Muriithi <fredmanglis@gmail.com> wrote:
> Adds a new package definition [python-alabaster]

What's wrong with python-sphinx-alabaster-theme which is already in master? Do you object to the name?

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[Frederick Muriithi]

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 3:56 PM, Danny Milosavljevic
<dannym@scratchpost.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:12:47 +0300
> Frederick Muriithi <fredmanglis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Adds a new package definition [python-alabaster]
>
> What's wrong with python-sphinx-alabaster-theme which is already in master? Do you object to the name?

No. I do not object to the name. You may ignore my patch.

I started working on a series of dependencies for conda a while back,
and I'm now just working through them, to submit. I must have missed
that in the process. I apologise.

-- 
Frederick M. Muriithi

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[Danny Milosavljevic]

Hi,

okay, thanks anyway :)

Comparing them, the existing alabaster packagespec lists bsd-3 as license. But you list license:non-copyleft "https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE". Is it actually different?

It seems <https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE> specifies "Some rights reserved" in addition to mostly bsd-3. I wonder whether we should use your license reference instead...

Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster

[Frederick Muriithi]

On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:32 PM, Danny Milosavljevic
<dannym@scratchpost.org> wrote:
> Comparing them, the existing alabaster packagespec lists bsd-3 as license. But you list license:non-copyleft "https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE". Is it actually different?
>
> It seems <https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE> specifies "Some rights reserved" in addition to mostly bsd-3. I wonder whether we should use your license reference instead...
>

I guess you could leave it as bsd-3 for now. I am still on a learning
curve, and so, since I could not quite tell which license it was, I
preferred to err on the side of caution and point to it directly,
since the repo did not explicitly state it was bsd-3

-- 
Frederick M. Muriithi