From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Danny Milosavljevic Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add python-alabaster Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 17:32:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20170204173238.0a74c97a@scratchpost.org> References: <20170204135647.0c15f38d@scratchpost.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59671) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca3Gq-00053b-PD for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 11:33:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca3Gl-0006q6-S0 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 11:33:04 -0500 Received: from dd1012.kasserver.com ([85.13.128.8]:38711) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ca3Gl-0006oK-LY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 04 Feb 2017 11:32:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Frederick Muriithi Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi, okay, thanks anyway :) Comparing them, the existing alabaster packagespec lists bsd-3 as license. But you list license:non-copyleft "https://github.com/bitprophet/alabaster/blob/master/LICENSE". Is it actually different? It seems specifies "Some rights reserved" in addition to mostly bsd-3. I wonder whether we should use your license reference instead...