From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: bug#22049: libreoffice compile error Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 19:20:46 -0500 Message-ID: <20160302002046.GA18810@jasmine> References: <877fl0lugc.fsf@gnu.org> <931b1698a0a6d10913db88e944622dc4@openmailbox.org> <20151130195654.GA32198@jasmine> <87h9gsvhep.fsf@gnu.org> <20160229083540.GA18295@jasmine> <20160229083723.GA18766@jasmine> <878u22pbfr.fsf@gnu.org> <20160301172445.GB6052@jasmine> <20160301180148.GB5055@jasmine> <87r3fuoryy.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55597) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aauXK-0007UN-7x for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:21:07 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aauXH-0004T1-1T for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:21:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59683) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aauXG-0004Sm-U9 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:21:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1aauXG-0004o3-QK for bug-guix@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 19:21:02 -0500 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-To: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Message-ID: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r3fuoryy.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: rennes@openmailbox.org, 22049-done@debbugs.gnu.org On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:36:53PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Leo Famulari skribis: > > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> > Leo Famulari skribis: > >> > > >> > > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > >> > > Message-Id: > >> > > From: Leo Famulari > >> > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 > >> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686. > >> > > > >> > > Fixes . > >> > > > >> > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch, > >> > > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files. > >> > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them. > >> > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox > >> > > and patch/testBoxAlgo. > >> > > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase. > >> > > >> > Cool! > >> > > >> > I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to > >> > apply it unconditionally. WDYT? > >> > >> Sure, I'll send an updated patch. > > > > Attached. > > > > [...] > > >> > So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option? > >> > >> 2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without > >> success. > > Oops, sorry. :-) > > > From 2f895108a3f476038b82e03645ee7f51e4ee1675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Leo Famulari > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ilmbase: Add patch to fix build on i686. > > > > Fixes . > > > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-fix-tests.patch: New file. > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[source]: Add patch. > > Perfect, thanks again! Pushed as 5e8276dcf4e3a, and closing. > > Ludo’.