[bug#40040] Resubmission of patch for Package Description for CRAN Package r-crochet

[Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1746 bytes --]

Hi Naga,

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 23:05:35 +0530
Naga Malleswari <nagamalli@riseup.net> wrote:

> > Also, we are using automated tools to apply these patches.  For that to work
> > right without manual fiddling, please put eventual mail text below the "---"
> > and above the "diff" (so it's filtered out by the automated tool).  
> 
> Actually i dint get the "Eventual mail text" part. All i have is this in
> the patch file

Nevermind, I'll just edit it.

> Yes, you are correct. I have downloaded package description through 
> guix import cran -r <package>. This resulted expat licence.
> 
> But its showing as MIT in the following link.
> 
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/crochet/

Hmm, that looks better.  Weird.

But just judging from https://github.com/agrueneberg/crochet , I wouldn't
have thought that that was under MIT license.  The only mention there
is in the DESCRIPTION file.  Is that enough for Guix?

> The authors github page shows a file licence. Does it mean there is no
> proper licensing applied for the package? In that case what should we do.

Let's wait until someone knowledgeable in CRAN posts.

Could you open an issue on https://github.com/agrueneberg/crochet asking
them to put an Expat license file into the project if that's their intention?

> r-isoband is showing expat in guix import,   MIT in website(
> https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/isoband/index.html) ,  git page
> shows a file https://github.com/wilkelab/isoband

That has a file LICENSE.md which makes the situation a lot clearer
for that package.

> MIT [...] Expat

MIT is an ambiguous reference, actually it can be either Expat or X11.

See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]