* [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
@ 2018-04-22 12:58 宋文武
2018-04-22 22:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: 宋文武 @ 2018-04-22 12:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 31237; +Cc: 宋文武
* gnu/packages/virtualization.scm (runc): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/virtualization.scm | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 53 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/virtualization.scm b/gnu/packages/virtualization.scm
index 55ace5a56..e6d52c870 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/virtualization.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/virtualization.scm
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@
;;; Copyright © 2017 Rutger Helling <rhelling@mykolab.com>
;;; Copyright © 2017, 2018 Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
;;; Copyright © 2018 Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
+;;; Copyright © 2018 Sou Bunnbu <iyzsong@member.fsf.org>
;;;
;;; This file is part of GNU Guix.
;;;
@@ -41,6 +42,7 @@
#:use-module (gnu packages gl)
#:use-module (gnu packages glib)
#:use-module (gnu packages gnome)
+ #:use-module (gnu packages golang)
#:use-module (gnu packages gtk)
#:use-module (gnu packages image)
#:use-module (gnu packages libusb)
@@ -65,7 +67,8 @@
#:use-module (guix build-system gnu)
#:use-module (guix build-system python)
#:use-module (guix download)
- #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:select (gpl2 gpl2+ gpl3+ lgpl2.1 lgpl2.1+))
+ #:use-module ((guix licenses) #:select (gpl2 gpl2+ gpl3+ lgpl2.1 lgpl2.1+
+ asl2.0))
#:use-module (guix packages)
#:use-module (guix utils)
#:use-module (srfi srfi-1))
@@ -772,3 +775,52 @@ monitor/GPU.")
;; This package requires SSE instructions.
(supported-systems '("i686-linux" "x86_64-linux"))
(license gpl2+)))
+
+(define-public runc
+ (package
+ (name "runc")
+ (version "1.0.0-rc5")
+ (source (origin
+ (method url-fetch)
+ (uri (string-append
+ "https://github.com/opencontainers/runc/releases/"
+ "download/v" version "/runc.tar.xz"))
+ (sha256
+ (base32
+ "081avdzwnqpk368wbaihlzsypaxpj42d7699h7jgp0fks14x4103"))))
+ (build-system gnu-build-system)
+ (arguments
+ '(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 20/139 tests fail.
+ #:test-target "localunittest"
+ #:phases
+ (modify-phases %standard-phases
+ (delete 'configure) ; no 'configure' script
+ (replace 'build
+ (lambda _
+ (let* ((gopath (string-append (getenv "TMPDIR") "/go"))
+ (srcdir (string-append
+ gopath "/src/github.com/opencontainers/runc")))
+ (setenv "GOPATH" gopath)
+ (mkdir-p (dirname srcdir))
+ (copy-recursively (getcwd) srcdir)
+ (chdir srcdir)
+ ;; XXX: requires 'go-md2man'.
+ ;; (invoke "make man")
+ (invoke "make"))))
+ (replace 'install
+ (lambda* (#:key outputs #:allow-other-keys)
+ (let ((out (assoc-ref outputs "out")))
+ (invoke "make" "install" "install-bash"
+ (string-append "PREFIX=" out))))))))
+ (native-inputs
+ `(("go" ,go)
+ ("pkg-config" ,pkg-config)))
+ (inputs
+ `(("libseccomp" ,libseccomp)))
+ (synopsis "Open container initiative runtime")
+ (home-page "https://www.opencontainers.org/")
+ (description
+ "@command{runc} is a command line client for running applications
+packaged according to the Open Container Initiative (OCI) format and is a
+compliant implementation of the Open Container Initiative specification.")
+ (license asl2.0)))
--
2.13.3
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
2018-04-22 12:58 [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc 宋文武
@ 2018-04-22 22:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-22 23:06 ` Nils Gillmann
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2018-04-22 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 宋文武; +Cc: 31237
Hello,
宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org> skribis:
> * gnu/packages/virtualization.scm (runc): New variable.
Nice!
> +(define-public runc
> + (package
> + (name "runc")
> + (version "1.0.0-rc5")
If the actual release is going to be out soon, I’d be in favor of
waiting for it; an RC doesn’t sound great. WDYT?
> + (build-system gnu-build-system)
Would ‘go-build-system’ work better? Or is it something of a hybrid
(apparently it has makefiles)?
> + (arguments
> + '(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 20/139 tests fail.
Have you looked a bit into them, just to see if it’s one of the usual
things (/bin/sh, networking, etc.) or if it’s more involved?
> + (invoke "make"))))
Perhaps honor (parallel-job-count).
> + (synopsis "Open container initiative runtime")
> + (home-page "https://www.opencontainers.org/")
> + (description
> + "@command{runc} is a command line client for running applications
> +packaged according to the Open Container Initiative (OCI) format and is a
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
An @uref would be nice. :-)
Thanks!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
2018-04-22 22:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2018-04-22 23:06 ` Nils Gillmann
2018-04-23 3:25 ` 宋文武
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Nils Gillmann @ 2018-04-22 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 宋文武, 31237
Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.2K bytes:
> Hello,
>
> 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org> skribis:
>
> > * gnu/packages/virtualization.scm (runc): New variable.
>
> Nice!
>
> > +(define-public runc
> > + (package
> > + (name "runc")
> > + (version "1.0.0-rc5")
>
> If the actual release is going to be out soon, I’d be in favor of
> waiting for it; an RC doesn’t sound great. WDYT?
What I wanted to comment earlier from my experience packaging this:
I was advised to follow the docker suggestions, where the dependency
versions are known by recommended commit.
> > + (build-system gnu-build-system)
>
> Would ‘go-build-system’ work better? Or is it something of a hybrid
> (apparently it has makefiles)?
Same question here, since my runc package so far (without testing) just builds,
with go-build-system.
> > + (arguments
> > + '(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 20/139 tests fail.
>
> Have you looked a bit into them, just to see if it’s one of the usual
> things (/bin/sh, networking, etc.) or if it’s more involved?
>
> > + (invoke "make"))))
>
> Perhaps honor (parallel-job-count).
>
> > + (synopsis "Open container initiative runtime")
> > + (home-page "https://www.opencontainers.org/")
> > + (description
> > + "@command{runc} is a command line client for running applications
> > +packaged according to the Open Container Initiative (OCI) format and is a
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
> An @uref would be nice. :-)
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ludo’.
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
2018-04-22 23:06 ` Nils Gillmann
@ 2018-04-23 3:25 ` 宋文武
2018-04-23 9:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: 宋文武 @ 2018-04-23 3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nils Gillmann; +Cc: 31237
Nils Gillmann <ng0@n0.is> writes:
> Ludovic Courtès transcribed 1.2K bytes:
>> Hello,
>>
>> 宋文武 <iyzsong@member.fsf.org> skribis:
>>
>> > * gnu/packages/virtualization.scm (runc): New variable.
>>
>> Nice!
>>
>> > +(define-public runc
>> > + (package
>> > + (name "runc")
>> > + (version "1.0.0-rc5")
>>
>> If the actual release is going to be out soon, I’d be in favor of
>> waiting for it; an RC doesn’t sound great. WDYT?
Sure, but it's not clear to me when the 1.0.0 release will be out...
>
> What I wanted to comment earlier from my experience packaging this:
> I was advised to follow the docker suggestions, where the dependency
> versions are known by recommended commit.
Okay, I have some ideas to use runc directly with rootfs bulit by guix,
I haven't looked into docker yet.
>
>> > + (build-system gnu-build-system)
>>
>> Would ‘go-build-system’ work better? Or is it something of a hybrid
>> (apparently it has makefiles)?
>
> Same question here, since my runc package so far (without testing) just builds,
> with go-build-system.
Okay, I have to modify the unpack phase for the tarball.
>
>> > + (arguments
>> > + '(#:tests? #f ; FIXME: 20/139 tests fail.
>>
>> Have you looked a bit into them, just to see if it’s one of the usual
>> things (/bin/sh, networking, etc.) or if it’s more involved?
No I haven't, some fails are:
--- FAIL: TestFactoryNewTmpfs (0.00s)
factory_linux_test.go:87: operation not permitted
FAIL github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer 0.047s
? github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor [no test files]
--- FAIL: TestInvalidCgroupPath (0.00s)
apply_raw_test.go:16: couldn't get cgroup root: mountpoint for cgroup not found
apply_raw_test.go:25: couldn't get cgroup data: mountpoint for cgroup not found
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
--- FAIL: TestValidateRootlessMountUid (0.00s)
rootless_test.go:96: Expected error to not occur when uid= not set in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
rootless_test.go:106: Expected error to not occur when setting uid=0 in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
rootless_test.go:112: Expected error to not occur when setting uid=2 in mount options and UidMapping[0].size is 10
--- FAIL: TestValidateValidSysctl (0.00s)
validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {net.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {kernel.msgmax=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {fs.mqueue.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
--- FAIL: TestNsenterValidPaths (0.01s)
nsenter_test.go:65: nsenter exits with a non-zero exit status
Look like it need /var, network namespace and other things? But thoes
are unittest (runc also has integrationtest target)... Need more
investment.
>>
>> > + (invoke "make"))))
>>
>> Perhaps honor (parallel-job-count).
Thanks for the tip! Now I think it's not needed, since the target only
run one 'go build' command, so there is nothing to be executed
parallel...
>>
>> > + (synopsis "Open container initiative runtime")
>> > + (home-page "https://www.opencontainers.org/")
>> > + (description
>> > + "@command{runc} is a command line client for running applications
>> > +packaged according to the Open Container Initiative (OCI) format and is a
>> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
>> An @uref would be nice. :-)
Okay.
Pushed, thanks ludo and ng0 for the review!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
2018-04-23 3:25 ` 宋文武
@ 2018-04-23 9:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-26 1:39 ` bug#31237: " 宋文武
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Courtès @ 2018-04-23 9:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 宋文武; +Cc: Nils Gillmann, 31237
Hello,
iyzsong@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
> No I haven't, some fails are:
>
> --- FAIL: TestFactoryNewTmpfs (0.00s)
> factory_linux_test.go:87: operation not permitted
>
> FAIL github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer 0.047s
> ? github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor [no test files]
>
> --- FAIL: TestInvalidCgroupPath (0.00s)
> apply_raw_test.go:16: couldn't get cgroup root: mountpoint for cgroup not found
> apply_raw_test.go:25: couldn't get cgroup data: mountpoint for cgroup not found
> panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
>
> --- FAIL: TestValidateRootlessMountUid (0.00s)
> rootless_test.go:96: Expected error to not occur when uid= not set in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
> rootless_test.go:106: Expected error to not occur when setting uid=0 in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
> rootless_test.go:112: Expected error to not occur when setting uid=2 in mount options and UidMapping[0].size is 10
>
> --- FAIL: TestValidateValidSysctl (0.00s)
> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {net.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {kernel.msgmax=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with {fs.mqueue.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
>
> --- FAIL: TestNsenterValidPaths (0.01s)
> nsenter_test.go:65: nsenter exits with a non-zero exit status
>
>
> Look like it need /var, network namespace and other things? But thoes
> are unittest (runc also has integrationtest target)... Need more
> investment.
Right. For now I think we could skip all the tests above, with a
comment explaining the reason (/var, cgroups, and apparmor unavailable
in the build environment.)
Thank you!
Ludo’.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* bug#31237: [PATCH] gnu: Add runc.
2018-04-23 9:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
@ 2018-04-26 1:39 ` 宋文武
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: 宋文武 @ 2018-04-26 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ludovic Courtès; +Cc: 31237-done
ludo@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> iyzsong@member.fsf.org (宋文武) skribis:
>
>> No I haven't, some fails are:
>>
>> --- FAIL: TestFactoryNewTmpfs (0.00s)
>> factory_linux_test.go:87: operation not permitted
>>
>> FAIL github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer 0.047s
>> ? github.com/opencontainers/runc/libcontainer/apparmor [no test files]
>>
>> --- FAIL: TestInvalidCgroupPath (0.00s)
>> apply_raw_test.go:16: couldn't get cgroup root: mountpoint for
>> cgroup not found
>> apply_raw_test.go:25: couldn't get cgroup data: mountpoint for
>> cgroup not found
>> panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference [recovered]
>>
>> --- FAIL: TestValidateRootlessMountUid (0.00s)
>> rootless_test.go:96: Expected error to not occur when uid= not
>> set in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
>> rootless_test.go:106: Expected error to not occur when setting
>> uid=0 in mount options: rootfs (/var) does not exist
>> rootless_test.go:112: Expected error to not occur when setting
>> uid=2 in mount options and UidMapping[0].size is 10
>>
>> --- FAIL: TestValidateValidSysctl (0.00s)
>> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with
>> {net.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
>> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with
>> {kernel.msgmax=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
>> validator_test.go:229: Expected error to not occur with
>> {fs.mqueue.ctl=ctl} but got: "rootfs (/var) does not exist"
>>
>> --- FAIL: TestNsenterValidPaths (0.01s)
>> nsenter_test.go:65: nsenter exits with a non-zero exit status
>>
>>
>> Look like it need /var, network namespace and other things? But thoes
>> are unittest (runc also has integrationtest target)... Need more
>> investment.
>
> Right. For now I think we could skip all the tests above, with a
> comment explaining the reason (/var, cgroups, and apparmor unavailable
> in the build environment.)
>
Done, thank you!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-04-26 1:41 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-04-22 12:58 [bug#31237] [PATCH] gnu: Add runc 宋文武
2018-04-22 22:08 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-22 23:06 ` Nils Gillmann
2018-04-23 3:25 ` 宋文武
2018-04-23 9:41 ` Ludovic Courtès
2018-04-26 1:39 ` bug#31237: " 宋文武
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).