Re: Introducing Guix "Features"! (Was: Syntactic Diabetes)

[Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>]

> Am Donnerstag, dem 01.02.2024 um 20:30 +0000 schrieb Attila Lendvai:
> 
> > for an average unix user a service is a process that is running in
> > the backgroud, doing stuff mostly without any user interaction. you
> > can try to argue this away, but i'm afraid that this is the state of
> > things.
> 
> Which is exactly what etc-service-type does. It symlinks stuff to /etc
> without user interaction.


we can spend our life honing in on a satisfying definition, but let it be enough that what is commonly understood as a service has an active component (see 'run' in my definition); i.e. it has a temporal dimension.

but honestly? it felt silly to even provide a definition in my mail. we either live in a different universe, or you're just focused on justify the status quo. whichever is the case, we have reached a dead end, because essentially, this is aesthetics.

but anyway, i gave my feedback, and as i don't have the authority to lobby for renaming core guix abstractions, i'm out.

-- 
• attila lendvai
• PGP: 963F 5D5F 45C7 DFCD 0A39
--
“Until you figure out that [manipulation] is going on, we're all going to be run like rats through a maze. Culture is an intelligence test, and when you pass that test you don't give a shit about culture.”
	— Terence McKenna (1946–2000)