From: "Ludovic Courtès" <ludo@gnu.org>
To: Edouard Klein <edou@rdklein.fr>
Cc: Attila Lendvai <attila@lendvai.name>,
Liliana Marie Prikler <liliana.prikler@gmail.com>,
guix-devel@gnu.org, Josselin Poiret <dev@jpoiret.xyz>
Subject: Re: Syntactic Diabetes (was Re: A friendlier API for operating-system declarations)
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2023 11:12:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fs0b8z23.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8734wsqwrh.fsf@rdklein.fr> (Edouard Klein's message of "Sun, 26 Nov 2023 17:49:42 +0100")
Hello!
Edouard Klein <edou@rdklein.fr> skribis:
> Thank you Liliana and Attila for the swift and actionable feedback :)
>
> Below is a revised proposition.
>
> Here is a minimal working example of an os declaration:
> ------------------mwe.scm---------------
> (use-modules
> (beaver system)
> (beaver functional-services)
> (gnu packages version-control)
> (gnu services web)
> (gnu services telephony)
> (gnu services ssh)
> (gnu services base)
> (guix gexp))
>
> (-> (minimal-ovh "osef")
> (instantiate nginx)
> (instantiate mumble-server
> (welcome-text "coucou")
> (port 64738))
> (extend openssh `(("alice" ,(local-file "/home/edouard/.ssh/id_rsa.pub"))))
> (modify openssh
> (password-authentication? #f)
> (allow-empty-passwords? #t))
> (remove guix))
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
> To see the value of this syntactic sugar, try to replicate this MWE with
> the standard syntax. It's not horrendous, but it *is* off-putting to
> many newcomers to git, whereas this sugary piece is more readable for
> them (sample size of 1, p=0.00000005).
Glad you ran a user study. :-)
This is looking more and more like:
(define-syntax ->
(syntax-rules ()
((_ os rules ...)
(operating-system
(inherit os)
(services (modify-services (operating-system-user-services os)
rules ...))))))
One thing that always makes me hesitate due to the longstanding hygienic
macro tradition in Scheme is non-hyienic introduction of identifiers: in
the example you gave above, the identifiers ‘openssh-service-type’ and
‘openssh-configuration’ are automatically derived from ‘openssh’. This
could lead to surprises and makes grepping harder. But I don’t know,
maybe that’s the price to pay?
Maybe one conclusion we can draw from this is that configuration records
and service types should be more closely tied to one another.
>>> (service+ OS SERVICE [CONF])
>>> (service- OS SERVICE)
This one looked really revolutionary, but it’s inspiring too!
Thanks,
Ludo’.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-09 10:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-23 8:06 A friendlier API for operating-system declarations Edouard Klein
2023-03-23 18:48 ` Josselin Poiret
2023-03-23 20:23 ` Edouard Klein
2023-03-23 21:05 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-04-13 9:42 ` Ludovic Courtès
2023-05-18 14:37 ` Edouard Klein
2023-11-24 21:43 ` Syntactic Diabetes (was Re: A friendlier API for operating-system declarations) Edouard Klein
2023-11-24 22:50 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-11-25 20:14 ` Attila Lendvai
2023-11-26 5:36 ` Michal Atlas
2023-11-26 16:49 ` Edouard Klein
2023-11-26 18:32 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-11-26 20:46 ` Edouard Klein
2023-11-27 21:09 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2023-11-29 20:12 ` Attila Lendvai
2023-11-29 23:39 ` Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2023-11-30 11:16 ` Attila Lendvai
2023-12-01 18:18 ` Michal Atlas
2024-02-01 13:29 ` Introducing Guix "Features"! (Was: Syntactic Diabetes) Felix Lechner via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution.
2024-02-01 19:43 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-02-01 20:30 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-02-01 20:46 ` Liliana Marie Prikler
2024-02-02 20:11 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-02-01 21:02 ` Ricardo Wurmus
2024-02-02 19:36 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-02-02 20:21 ` Vagrant Cascadian
2024-02-02 21:25 ` Attila Lendvai
2024-02-02 0:03 ` Introducing Guix "Features"! Carlo Zancanaro
2024-02-18 15:07 ` Introducing Guix "Features"! (Was: Syntactic Diabetes) Edouard Klein
2023-12-09 10:12 ` Ludovic Courtès [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://guix.gnu.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87fs0b8z23.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=ludo@gnu.org \
--cc=attila@lendvai.name \
--cc=dev@jpoiret.xyz \
--cc=edou@rdklein.fr \
--cc=guix-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=liliana.prikler@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).